Impact of the Immediate Release of Clinical Information Rules on Health Care Delivery to Patients With Cancer

被引:5
作者
Anyidoho, P. Abena [3 ]
Verschraegen, Claire F. [4 ]
Markham, Merry Jennifer [5 ]
Alberts, Steven [6 ]
Sweetenham, John [7 ]
Cameron, Kendra [8 ]
Abu Hejleh, Taher [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Carver Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Div Oncol Hematol & Blood & Marrow Transplantat, C32 GH 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Educ & Human Ecol, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[7] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[8] Assoc Amer Canc Inst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/OP.22.00712
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE:The 21st Century Cures Act mandates the immediate release of clinical information (IRCI) to patients. Immediate sharing of sensitive test results to patients with cancer might have serious unintended consequences for patients and providers.METHODS:A 22-question REDCap survey was designed by the Association of American Cancer Institutes Physician Clinical Leadership Initiative Steering Committee to explore oncology providers' opinions on IRCI policy implementation. It was administered twice in 2021 with a 3-month interval. A third survey with a single question seeking providers' opinions about their adaptation to the IRCI mandate was administered 1 year later to those who had responded to the earlier surveys. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. The survey was sent to all Association of American Cancer Institutes cancer center members. In the first or second administration, 167 practitioners answered the survey; 31 responded to the third survey.RESULTS:Three quarters of the providers did not favor the new requirement for IRCI and 62% encountered questions from patients about results being sent to them without provider interpretation. Only half of the hospitals had a plan in place to deal with the new IRCI requirements. A third survey, for longitudinal follow-up, indicated a more favorable trend toward adoption of IRCI.CONCLUSION:IRCI for patients with cancer was perceived negatively by academic oncology providers after its implementation. It was viewed to be associated with higher levels of patient anxiety and complaints about the care delivered. Providers preferred to discuss test results with patients before release.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Patient access to clinical notes in oncology: A mixed method analysis of oncologists' attitudes and linguistic characteristics towards notes [J].
Alpert, Jordan M. ;
Morris, Bonny B. ;
Thomson, Maria D. ;
Matin, Khalid ;
Sabo, Roy T. ;
Brown, Richard F. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (10) :1917-1924
[2]   Identifying How Patient Portals Impact Communication in Oncology [J].
Alpert, Jordan M. ;
Morris, Bonny B. ;
Thomson, Maria D. ;
Matin, Khalid ;
Brown, Richard F. .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2019, 34 (12) :1395-1403
[3]   Implications of Patient Portal Transparency in Oncology: Qualitative Interview Study on the Experiences of Patients, Oncologists, and Medical Informaticists [J].
Alpert, Jordan M. ;
Morris, Bonny B. ;
Thomson, Msph Maria D. ;
Matin, Khalid ;
Brown, Richard F. E. .
JMIR CANCER, 2018, 4 (01)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 21 CENT CUR ACT PUBL
[5]   Tempering the 21st Century Cures Act: Physicians, Policy Advocacy, and Kentucky's Solution [J].
Arnold, Susanne M. ;
Allison, Catherine L. ;
Bernard, Philip .
JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 18 (09) :603-+
[6]   Health Information Blocking: Responses Under the 21st Century Cures Act [J].
Black, Jennifer R. ;
Hulkower, Rachel L. ;
Ramanathan, Tara .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2018, 133 (05) :610-613
[7]  
Blease C, 2020, LANCET ONCOL, V21, P1136, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30423-X
[8]   A systematic review of patient access to medical records in the acute setting: practicalities, perspectives and ethical consequences [J].
D'Costa, Stephanie N. ;
Kuhn, Isla L. ;
Fritz, Zoe .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 21 (01)
[9]   Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead [J].
Delbanco, Tom ;
Walker, Jan ;
Bell, Sigall K. ;
Darer, Jonathan D. ;
Elmore, Joann G. ;
Farag, Nadine ;
Feldman, Henry J. ;
Mejilla, Roanne ;
Ngo, Long ;
Ralston, James D. ;
Ross, Stephen E. ;
Trivedi, Neha ;
Vodicka, Elisabeth ;
Leveille, Suzanne G. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (07) :461-U36
[10]   The Views and Experiences of Clinicians Sharing Medical Record Notes With Patients [J].
DesRoches, Catherine M. ;
Leveille, Suzanne ;
Bell, Sigall K. ;
Dong, Zhiyong J. ;
Elmore, Joann G. ;
Fernandez, Leonor ;
Harcourt, Kendall ;
Fitzgerald, Patricia ;
Payne, Thomas H. ;
Stametz, Rebecca ;
Delbanco, Tom ;
Walker, Jan .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (03) :e201753