The road to electrification: Bus fleet replacement strategies

被引:16
|
作者
Zhou, Yu [1 ]
Ong, Ghim Ping [1 ]
Meng, Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
关键词
Electric bus; Bus replacement; Electrification; Emission reduction; Integer programming model; ENERGY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY; OPTIMIZATION; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120903
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The public transport market in most global cities is dominated by diesel buses, which can have significant adverse impacts on the environment and human health. To reach carbon neutrality, many public transport operators are attempting to replace their existing bus fleets with electric buses (EBs). This paper develops a generic bus replacement model to help public transit (PT) operators progressively renew their existing bus fleets so as to reach particular electrification goals within a given planning horizon. Unlike existing studies, our model more comprehensively considers the external costs, which include external climate costs, external health costs and used battery recycling costs/profits. Furthermore, by incorporating different incentives, variants on the model can be adopted to investigate how different government incentives can affect the replacement behaviors of PT operators. Finally, our proposed approach is applied to real-world data from a bus operator in Singapore which is aiming to achieve a 100% cleaner energy bus fleet within 20 years. The experiments indicate that an EB subsidy can effectively accelerate the electrification process, and a 25% EB subsidy could achieve full electri-fication eight years earlier than if no EB subsidy were applied. Moreover, we explore how the diesel tax and diesel bus (DB) tax affect EB replacement. Our experiments suggest a 10% diesel tax rate can achieve good results but imposing a DB tax will not encourage PT operators to purchase EBs earlier.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of bus fleet size on performance of self-equalise bus headway control method
    Liang, Shidong
    Ma, Minghui
    He, Shengxue
    Zhang, Hu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2019, 172 (04) : 246 - 256
  • [42] Modelling benefit-to-cost ratio for initial phase electrification using battery electric bus
    Panta, Utsav
    Gairola, Pranav
    Nezamuddin, N.
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2024, 145 : 137 - 149
  • [43] Modeling an Investment Framework for BMTA Electric Bus Fleet Development
    Wanitanukul, Sorawit
    Kubaha, Kuskana
    Songprakorp, Roongrojana
    WORLD ELECTRIC VEHICLE JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (05):
  • [44] Optimal Scheduling to Manage an Electric Bus Fleet Overnight Charging
    Houbbadi, Adnane
    Trigui, Rochdi
    Pelissier, Serge
    Redondo-Iglesias, Eduardo
    Bouton, Tanguy
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (14):
  • [45] The case for negotiated contracts under the transition to a green bus fleet
    Hensher, David A.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 154 : 255 - 269
  • [46] A risk management system for sustainable fleet replacement
    Ansaripoor, Amir H.
    Oliveira, Fernando S.
    Liret, Anne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 237 (02) : 701 - 712
  • [47] STRATEGIC VEHICLE FLEET MANAGEMENT - THE REPLACEMENT PROBLEM
    Redmer, Adam
    LOGFORUM, 2016, 12 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [48] Influence of Increasing Electrification of Passenger Vehicle Fleet on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Finland
    Lajunen, Antti
    Kivekas, Klaus
    Vepsalainen, Jari
    Tammi, Kari
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [49] Balancing biofuels and electrification: Carbon neutrality pathways of Brazilian light vehicle fleet
    Lima, Paulo Sergio Pinheiro
    Seabra, Joaquim Eugenio Abel
    Cunha, Marcelo Pereira
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 139
  • [50] INCLUDING EXTERNALITIES IN THE COSTS ANALYSIS OF BUS FLEET: A CASE STUDY
    Emiliano, William
    Ferreira, Paula
    Afonso, Paulo
    Telhada, Jose
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT (ICEE 2017), 2017, : 418 - 424