Segmented Information, Segregated Outcomes: Housing Affordability and Neighborhood Representation on a Voucher-Focused Online Housing Platform and Three Mainstream Alternatives

被引:1
作者
Hess, Chris [1 ]
Walter, Rebecca J. [2 ]
Kennedy, Ian [3 ]
Acolin, Arthur [2 ]
Ramiller, Alex [4 ]
Crowder, Kyle [5 ]
机构
[1] Kennesaw State Univ, Sociol & Criminal Justice, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Real Estate, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Rice Univ, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept City & Reg Planning, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Sociol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Housing platforms; residential segregation; neighborhood stratification; housing search; housing policy; DECONCENTRATING POVERTY; CHOICE; MOBILITY; PROGRAM; RELOCATION; LOCATIONS; USERS; RACE;
D O I
10.1080/10511482.2022.2133548
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Online platforms have become an integral component of the housing search process in the United States and other developed contexts, but recent studies have demonstrated that these platforms offer uneven representation of different neighborhoods. In this study, we use listings covering the 50 largest U.S. metropolitan areas to assess how GoSection8, a platform uniquely focused on affordable housing and voucher-assisted households, compares with the "mainstream" alternatives of Craigslist, Apartments.com, and Zillow. Through descriptive and regression analyses of the housing and neighborhoods represented on these websites and a new way of measuring the distribution of rental housing opportunities, we advance a multisource perspective on the role of online information exchanges in housing search processes. Specifically, we find that GoSection8 and mainstream alternatives capture spatially segmented information about housing markets, with GoSection8 ads representing units that are more affordable but also more constrained to higher-poverty neighborhoods where assisted households are already concentrated. The findings suggest that disadvantaged households are potentially funneled toward high-poverty, isolated neighborhoods by the operation of stratified information systems available for online housing searches.
引用
收藏
页码:1511 / 1535
页数:25
相关论文
共 61 条
[11]   Voucher Users and Revitalized Public-Housing Residents 6 Years After Displacement [J].
Brooks, Fred ;
Lewinson, Terri ;
Aszman, Jennifer ;
Wolk, Jim .
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2012, 22 (01) :10-19
[12]   Choice Set Formation in Residential Mobility and Its Implications for Segregation Dynamics [J].
Bruch, Elizabeth ;
Swait, Joffre .
DEMOGRAPHY, 2019, 56 (05) :1665-1692
[13]  
Comey J., 2008, STRUGGLING STAY OUT
[14]  
Costa A, 2021, CITYSCAPE, V23, P327
[15]  
Daniel TH, 2010, GEORGETOWN LAW J, V98, P769
[16]   Segregating Shelter: How Housing Policies Shape the Residential Locations of Low-Income Minority Families [J].
DeLuca, Stefanie ;
Garboden, Philip M. E. ;
Rosenblatt, Peter .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2013, 647 (01) :268-299
[17]  
Devine DeborahJ., 2003, "Housing Choice Voucher Location Patterns: Implications for Participant and Neighborhood Welfare"
[18]   Advancing Choice in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: Source of Income Protections and Locational Outcomes [J].
Ellen, Ingrid Gould ;
O'Regan, Katherine M. ;
Harwood, Katharine W. H. .
HOUSING POLICY DEBATE, 2023, 33 (04) :941-962
[19]  
Eubanks V., 2018, Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor
[20]   We Built This: Consequences of New Deal Era Intervention in America's Racial Geography [J].
Faber, Jacob W. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2020, 85 (05) :739-775