Exploring dimension learning via a penalized probabilistic principal component analysis

被引:3
作者
Deng, Wei Q. [1 ,2 ]
Craiu, Radu, V [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Peter Boris Ctr Addict Res, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Stat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Dimension estimation; model selection; penalization; principal component analysis; probabilistic principal component analysis; profile likelihood; SELECTION; COVARIANCE; NUMBER; EIGENVALUES; SHRINKAGE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1080/00949655.2022.2100890
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Establishing a low-dimensional representation of the data leads to efficient data learning strategies. In many cases, the reduced dimension needs to be explicitly stated and estimated from the data. We explore the estimation of dimension in finite samples as a constrained optimization problem, where the estimated dimension is a maximizer of a penalized profile likelihood criterion within the framework of a probabilistic principal components analysis. Unlike other penalized maximization problems that require an 'optimal' penalty tuning parameter, we propose a data-averaging procedure whereby the estimated dimension emerges as the most favourable choice over a range of plausible penalty parameters. The proposed heuristic is compared to a large number of alternative criteria in simulations and an application to gene expression data. Extensive simulation studies reveal that none of the methods uniformly dominate the other and highlight the importance of subject-specific knowledge in choosing statistical methods for dimension learning. Our application results also suggest that gene expression data have a higher intrinsic dimension than previously thought. Overall, our proposed heuristic strikes a good balance and is the method of choice when model assumptions deviated moderately.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 297
页数:32
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Latent variable models and factor analysis
[2]   Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models [J].
Bai, JS ;
Ng, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (01) :191-221
[3]  
BARTLETT MS, 1954, J ROY STAT SOC B, V16, P296
[4]   OPTIMAL DETECTION OF SPARSE PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS IN HIGH DIMENSION [J].
Berthet, Quentin ;
Rigollet, Philippe .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2013, 41 (04) :1780-1815
[5]   Sparse estimation of a covariance matrix [J].
Bien, Jacob ;
Tibshirani, Robert J. .
BIOMETRIKA, 2011, 98 (04) :807-820
[6]  
Bishop CM, 1999, ADV NEUR IN, V11, P382
[7]  
Bishop CM, 1999, IEE CONF PUBL, P509, DOI 10.1049/cp:19991160
[8]  
Bouveyron C., 2017, ARXIV
[9]   SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS [J].
CATTELL, RB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) :245-276
[10]   SELECTING THE NUMBER OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS: ESTIMATION OF THE TRUE RANK OF A NOISY MATRIX [J].
Choi, Yunjin ;
Taylor, Jonathan ;
Tibshirani, Robert .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2017, 45 (06) :2590-2617