PROTOCOL: Effects of social prescribing for older adults: An evidence and gap map

被引:0
作者
Ghogomu, Elizabeth Tanjong [1 ]
Welch, Vivian [2 ]
Yaqubi, Mojde [2 ]
Dewidar, Omar [2 ]
Barbeau, Victoria I. [2 ]
Biswas, Srija [3 ]
Card, Kiffer [4 ]
Hsiung, Sonia [3 ]
Muhl, Caitlin [5 ]
Nelson, Michelle [6 ]
Salzwedel, Douglas M. [7 ]
Saragosa, Marianne [8 ]
Yu, Cindy [9 ]
Mulligan, Kate [6 ]
Hebert, Paul [1 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Bruyere Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Bruyere Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Canadian Inst Social Prescribing, Canadian Red Cross, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Queens Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ British Columbia, Dept Anesthesiol Pharmacol & Therapeut, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[8] Sinai Hlth, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] GenWell Project, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[10] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
HEALTH; INTERVENTION; EFFICACY; WORKLOAD; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1002/cl2.1382
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis is the protocol for an evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: The aim of this evidence and gap map is to map the available evidence on the effectiveness of social prescribing interventions addressing a non-medical, health-related social need for older adults in any setting. Specific objectives are as follows: To identify existing evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews on the effects of community-based interventions that address non-medical, health-related social needs of older adults to improve their health and wellbeing. To identify research evidence gaps for new high-quality primary studies and systematic reviews. To highlight evidence of health equity considerations from included primary studies and systematic reviews.1.2.3.ObjectivesThis is the protocol for an evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: The aim of this evidence and gap map is to map the available evidence on the effectiveness of social prescribing interventions addressing a non-medical, health-related social need for older adults in any setting. Specific objectives are as follows: To identify existing evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews on the effects of community-based interventions that address non-medical, health-related social needs of older adults to improve their health and wellbeing. To identify research evidence gaps for new high-quality primary studies and systematic reviews. To highlight evidence of health equity considerations from included primary studies and systematic reviews.1.2.3.ObjectivesThis is the protocol for an evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: The aim of this evidence and gap map is to map the available evidence on the effectiveness of social prescribing interventions addressing a non-medical, health-related social need for older adults in any setting. Specific objectives are as follows: To identify existing evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews on the effects of community-based interventions that address non-medical, health-related social needs of older adults to improve their health and wellbeing. To identify research evidence gaps for new high-quality primary studies and systematic reviews. To highlight evidence of health equity considerations from included primary studies and systematic reviews.1.2.3.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Understanding the care and support needs of older people: a scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF) [J].
Abdi, Sarah ;
Spann, Alice ;
Borilovic, Jacinta ;
de Witte, Luc ;
Hawley, Mark .
BMC GERIATRICS, 2019, 19 (1)
[2]  
Adbowale V., 2014, The Pursuit of Happiness: A new ambition for our mental health
[3]   Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals [J].
Andermann, Anne .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 188 (17-18) :E474-E483
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Digital Solution Foundry and EPPI_Centre
[5]   Using self- determination theory to understand the social prescribing process: a qualitative study [J].
Bhatti, Sara ;
Rayner, Jennifer ;
Pinto, Andrew ;
Mulligan, Kate ;
Cole, Donald C. .
BJGP OPEN, 2021, 5 (02) :1-10
[6]   Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence [J].
Bickerdike, Liz ;
Booth, Alison ;
Wilson, Paul M. ;
Farley, Kate ;
Wright, Kath .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (04)
[7]  
Black Health Committee, 2022, New Black-focused Social Prescribing Project aims to improve health in Black communities with a proven holistic approach grounded in Afrocentric principles of wellbeing
[8]   Social prescribing in general practice: adding meaning to medicine [J].
Brandling, Janet ;
House, William .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2009, 59 (563) :454-456
[9]  
Bridgeable, 2022, Current state of social prescribing in Canada: Summary report
[10]   The challenges of integrating signposting into general practice: qualitative stakeholder perspectives on care navigation and social prescribing in primary care [J].
Brunton, Lisa ;
Tazzyman, Abigail ;
Ferguson, Jane ;
Hodgson, Damian ;
Nelson, Pauline A. .
BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 23 (01)