Experimental and finite element analysis on mechanical performance of prefabricated assembly inverted arch to lining joints of large section highway tunnel under direct shear loding

被引:2
作者
Chen, Zongping [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Yan [1 ]
Ye, Peihuan [1 ,4 ]
Zhang, Shiqian [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China
[2] Nanning Univ, Coll Architecture & Civil Engn, Nanning 530200, Peoples R China
[3] China Construction Eighth Engn Div Co Ltd, Shanghai 200122, Peoples R China
[4] Guangxi Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Liuzhou 545616, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Prefabricated inverted arch; Lining joint; Direct shear test; Shear bearing capacity; Finite element analysis; PLASTIC-DAMAGE MODEL; CONCRETE; INTERFACE; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105764
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To investigate the mechanical properties of the prefabricated inverted arch to cast-in-place lining joints, 21 "Z"shaped shear specimens for direct shear testing were designed and manufactured, with the interface planted steel bars ratio, interface size, and interface treatment method as variable parameters. The whole failure process of the joint under a direct shear stress state was observed and recorded during the test, the shear-slip curve of the specimen was obtained, failure mechanism and variation law of the joint's direct shear mechanical characteristics were carefully examined. The results reveal that the specimen's shear performance improves following the interface chiselling treatment. The specimens fail in three ways: simple concrete failure, simple planted steel bars failure, and assimilative failure of the concrete and the planted steel bars. The ultimate shear capacity, ductile failure capacity, resistance to damage evolution, and energy dissipation capacity of the specimens rise as the planted steel bars ratio increases. When the planted steel bars ratio increases from 0.7% to 1.1%, the improvement is the most significant, reaching 66.3%. When the planted steel bars ratio is the same, the shear bearing capacity improves as the interface size grows. The finite element model of the "Z"-shaped shear specimen of the prefabricated inverted arch and the cast-in-place lining joint is established, and the parameter extension analysis is performed. Based on the test results and the Extended Shear-Friction Theory, a high-accuracy calculation model of shear capacity of precast inverted arch and lining joint is presented.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] A.M.E.R.I.C.A.N.C.O.N.C.R.E.T.E.I.N.S.T.I.T.U.T.E, 2019, Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary: ACI 318-19
  • [2] Single keyed joints behaviour and capacity formulation under direct shear using non-linear finite-element analysis
    Al-Rousan, Rajai Z.
    Qudaisat, Muneer S.
    [J]. STRUCTURES, 2023, 47 : 911 - 924
  • [3] Anderson A.R., 1960, Progressive Architecture, V41, P172
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, Code for design of concrete structures
  • [5] Birkeland P.W., 1966, ACI J, V63, P345, DOI DOI 10.14359/7627
  • [6] Experimental and numerical study on shear behavior of shear pockets between ultra-high-performance and normal concrete for precast girder bridges
    Chen, Liang
    Yan, Jing
    Wu, Zhigang
    Yang, Dahai
    Li, Jianluan
    Xiang, Nailiang
    [J]. STRUCTURES, 2023, 55 : 1645 - 1658
  • [7] Analytical approach to predict tunneling-induced subsurface settlement in sand considering soil arching effect
    Chen, Ren-Peng
    Song, Xu
    Meng, Fan-Yan
    Wu, Huai-Na
    Lin, Xing-Tao
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2022, 141
  • [8] [陈宗平 Chen Zongping], 2019, [土木工程学报, China Civil Engineering Journal], V52, P8
  • [9] Chilwesa Minell, 2016, Magazine of Concrete Research, P1, DOI [10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)]
  • [10] Slant shear bond strength between self compacting concrete and old concrete
    Diab, Ahmed M.
    Elmoaty, Abd M. Abd Elmoaty
    Eldin, Mohamed R. Tag
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2017, 130 : 73 - 82