Site response analysis using true coupled constitutive models for liquefaction triggering

被引:1
|
作者
Mendoza-Bolanos, Cristhian C. [1 ]
Salas-Montoya, Andres [1 ]
-Torres, Oscar H. Moreno [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Andrade, Arturo I. Villegas- [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Colombia, Dept Civil Engn, Manizales, Colombia
[2] Univ Cooperat Colombia, Dept Civil Engn, Santa Marta, Colombia
[3] Univ Magdalena, Dept Civil Engn, Santa Marta, Colombia
关键词
calibration parameters; CRR; parametric study; porewater pressure; unidirectional shaking; DETERMINISTIC ASSESSMENT; PENETRATION TEST; SEISMIC RESPONSE; RESISTANCE; SOILS; CPT;
D O I
10.12989/eas.2023.25.1.027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study focused on nonlinear effective stress site response analysis using two coupled constitutive models, that is, the DM model (Dafalias and Manzari 2004), which incorporated a simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects, and the PMDY03 model (Khosravifar et al. 2018), that is, a 3D model for earthquake-induced liquefaction triggering and postliquefaction response. A detailed parametric study was conducted to validate the effectiveness of nonlinear site response analysis and porewater pressure (PWP) generation through a true coupled formulation for assessing the initiation of liquefaction at ground level. The coupled models demonstrated accurate prediction of liquefaction triggering, which was in line with established empirical liquefaction triggering relations in published databases. Several limitations were identified in the evaluation of liquefaction using the cyclic stress method, despite its widespread implementation for calculating liquefaction triggering. Variations in shear stiffness, represented by changes in shear wave velocity (Vs1), exerted the most significant influence on site response. The study further indicated that substantial differences in response spectra between nonlinear total stress and nonlinear effective stress analyses primarily occurred when liquefaction was triggered or on the verge of being triggered, as shown by excess PWP ratios approaching unity. These differences diminished when liquefaction occurred towards the later stages of intense shaking. The soil response was predominantly influenced by the higher stiffness values present prior to liquefaction. A key contribution of this study was to validate the criteria used to assess the triggering of level-ground liquefaction using true coupled effective-stress constitutive models, while also confirming the reliability of numerical approximations including the PDMY03 and DM models. These models effectively captured the principal characteristics of liquefaction observed in field tests and laboratory experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 41
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Nonlinear Site Response Analysis with Pore-Water Pressure Generation for Liquefaction Triggering Evaluation
    Olson, Scott M.
    Mei, Xuan
    Hashash, Youssef M. A.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (02)
  • [2] A New Equation to Evaluate Liquefaction Triggering Using the Response Surface Method and Parametric Sensitivity Analysis
    Pirhadi, Nima
    Tang, Xiaowei
    Yang, Qing
    Kang, Fei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [3] Importance of liquefaction resistance and fabric anisotropy simulation capability of constitutive models for liquefiable ground seismic response analysis
    Yu, Jia-ke
    Wang, Rui
    Zhang, Jian-Min
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2022, 150
  • [4] Site response and liquefaction hazard analysis of Hawassa town, Main Ethiopian Rift
    Ayele, Alemayehu
    Meten, Matebie
    Woldearegay, Kifle
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8
  • [5] Predicting liquefaction of unsaturated sands using a coupled hydro-mechanical elastoplastic constitutive model
    Zhang, B.
    Muraleetharan, K. K.
    Liu, C.
    UNSATURATED SOIL MECHANICS-FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, 2016, : 607 - 611
  • [6] Site-scale liquefaction potential analysis using a sectional random field model
    Gholampour, Amir
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2022, 297
  • [7] Evaluation of site effects on ground motions based on equivalent linear site response analysis and liquefaction potential in Chennai, south India
    Nampally, Subhadra
    Padhy, Simanchal
    Trupti, S.
    Prasad, P. Prabhakar
    Seshunarayana, T.
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2018, 22 (04) : 1075 - 1093
  • [8] Site-specific ground response analysis and liquefaction assessment of Vijayawada city (India)
    Satyam, Neelima D.
    Towhata, Ikuo
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2016, 81 (02) : 705 - 724
  • [9] Site response measurements and implications to soil liquefaction potential using microtremor H/V in Greater Metro Manila, Philippines
    Daag, A.
    Aque, L. E.
    Locaba, O.
    Grutas, R.
    Solidum Jr, R.
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [10] Liquefaction and Ground Response Analysis of Indian Pond Ash Using Shear Wave Velocity Measurements
    Mohanty, Supriya
    Patra, Nihar Ranjan
    GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SOIL DYNAMICS V: SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS, EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS, AND REGIONAL-SCALE ASSESSMENT, 2018, (291): : 504 - 513