Molecular Characterization and Landscape of Breast cancer Models from a multi-omics Perspective

被引:15
作者
Ortiz, Mylena M. O. [1 ]
Andrechek, Eran R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Genet & Genom Sci Program, E Lansing, MI USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Physiol, 2194 BPS Bldg 567 Wilson Rd, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Mouse models; Modeling systems; Sequencing; Gene expression; Integrated analysis; Cancer subtypes; GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS; TRANSGENIC MICE; MAMMARY-TUMORS; SINGLE-CELL; EMBRYONIC LETHALITY; PRECISION MEDICINE; MOUSE MODEL; STEM-CELLS; NEU; METASTASIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10911-023-09540-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is well-known to be a highly heterogenous disease. This facet of cancer makes finding a research model that mirrors the disparate intrinsic features challenging. With advances in multi-omics technologies, establishing parallels between the various models and human tumors is increasingly intricate. Here we review the various model systems and their relation to primary breast tumors using available omics data platforms. Among the research models reviewed here, breast cancer cell lines have the least resemblance to human tumors since they have accumulated many mutations and copy number alterations during their long use. Moreover, individual proteomic and metabolomic profiles do not overlap with the molecular landscape of breast cancer. Interestingly, omics analysis revealed that the initial subtype classification of some breast cancer cell lines was inappropriate. In cell lines the major subtypes are all well represented and share some features with primary tumors. In contrast, patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and patient-derived organoids (PDO) are superior in mirroring human breast cancers at many levels, making them suitable models for drug screening and molecular analysis. While patient derived organoids are spread across luminal, basal- and normal-like subtypes, the PDX samples were initially largely basal but other subtypes have been increasingly described. Murine models offer heterogenous tumor landscapes, inter and intra-model heterogeneity, and give rise to tumors of different phenotypes and histology. Murine models have a reduced mutational burden compared to human breast cancer but share some transcriptomic resemblance, and representation of many breast cancer subtypes can be found among the variety subtypes. To date, while mammospheres and three- dimensional cultures lack comprehensive omics data, these are excellent models for the study of stem cells, cell fate decision and differentiation, and have also been used for drug screening. Therefore, this review explores the molecular landscapes and characterization of breast cancer research models by comparing recent published multi-omics data and analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MOBCdb: a comprehensive database integrating multi-omics data on breast cancer for precision medicine
    Bingbing Xie
    Zifeng Yuan
    Yadong Yang
    Zhidan Sun
    Shuigeng Zhou
    Xiangdong Fang
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 169 : 625 - 632
  • [22] Integrating Multi-omics Data to Dissect Mechanisms of DNA repair Dysregulation in Breast Cancer
    Liu, Chao
    Rohart, Florian
    Simpson, Peter T.
    Khanna, Kum Kum
    Ragan, Mark A.
    Le Cao, Kim-Anh
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [23] Deep neural network aided multi-omics drug response prediction for breast cancer
    Vishnusankar, A.
    Unniyattil, Abhinav
    Haneem, E. M.
    Abinas, V.
    Nazeer, K. A. Abdul
    2022 IEEE 19TH INDIA COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, INDICON, 2022,
  • [24] Deep Learning for Integrated Analysis of Breast Cancer Subtype Specific Multi-omics Data
    Rakshit, Somnath
    Saha, Indrajit
    Chakraborty, Subha Shankar
    Plewczyski, Dariusz
    PROCEEDINGS OF TENCON 2018 - 2018 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, 2018, : 1917 - 1922
  • [25] Multi-omics research strategies in ischemic stroke: A multidimensional perspective
    Li, Wentao
    Shao, Chongyu
    Zhou, Huifen
    Du, Haixia
    Chen, Haiyang
    Wan, Haitong
    He, Yu
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2022, 81
  • [26] Multi-OMICS: a critical technical perspective on integrative lipidomics approaches
    Kopczynski, Dominik
    Coman, Cristina
    Zahedi, Rene P.
    Lorenz, Kristina
    Sickmann, Albert
    Ahrends, Robert
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY OF LIPIDS, 2017, 1862 (08): : 808 - 811
  • [27] A Multi-Omics Perspective of Quantitative Trait Loci in Precision Medicine
    Ye, Youqiong
    Zhang, Zhao
    Liu, Yaoming
    Diao, Lixia
    Han, Leng
    TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2020, 36 (05) : 318 - 336
  • [28] Systematic characterization of multi-omics landscape between gut microbial metabolites and GPCRome in Alzheimer's disease
    Qiu, Yunguang
    Hou, Yuan
    Gohel, Dhruv
    Zhou, Yadi
    Xu, Jielin
    Bykova, Marina
    Yang, Yuxin
    Leverenz, James B.
    Pieper, Andrew A.
    Nussinov, Ruth
    Caldwell, Jessica Z. K.
    Brown, J. Mark
    Cheng, Feixiong
    CELL REPORTS, 2024, 43 (05):
  • [29] Analyzing the Complex Regulatory Landscape of Hfq - an Integrative, Multi-Omics Approach
    Grenga, Lucia
    Chandra, Govind
    Saalbach, Gerhard
    Galmozzi, Carla V.
    Kramer, Guenter
    Malone, Jacob G.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [30] Deciphering breast cancer dynamics: insights from single-cell and spatial profiling in the multi-omics era
    Xiong, Xin
    Wang, Xin
    Liu, Cui-Cui
    Shao, Zhi-Ming
    Yu, Ke-Da
    BIOMARKER RESEARCH, 2024, 12 (01)