Emotional labour job characteristics in compassion work - differentiating exposure, empathy, compassion, and distancing

被引:4
作者
Kleineidam, Nicolai J. [1 ]
Fischbach, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] German Police Univ, Dept Social Work & Org Psychol, Munster, Germany
关键词
Emotional labour; compassion; empathy; empathic distress; detached concern; work role analysis; DETACHED CONCERN; BURNOUT; CONTAGION; STRESS; COMMUNICATION; DEMANDS; FATIGUE; RISK; WELL;
D O I
10.1080/02678373.2023.2199383
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Previous research on compassion work has focused on the emotion regulation of human services workers. However, little attention has been paid to the job characteristics of this work. In this paper, we conceptualise a model of compassion work that differentiates the task characteristics (1) exposure and (2) empathy, and the work style requirements (3) compassion and (4) distancing. We tested an operationalisation of our compassion work model for its factor structure and validity in two studies (total N = 985). Our findings confirmed the proposed four-factor structure. Moreover, as expected, exposure was positively related to engagement and burnout, suggesting exposure is a challenge stressor in compassion work; empathy was positively related to burnout, suggesting empathy is a hindrance stressor in compassion work; compassion was positively related to work engagement and work meaningfulness, suggesting it supports self-enhancement in compassion work; and finally distancing was negatively related to burnout, suggesting it supports health and well-being in compassion work. Overall, these findings suggest our model is a promising vantage point for future research, job design, and health prevention in compassion work.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 551
页数:21
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2022, World health statistics: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, STRUCT EQU MODELING
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, COLLABORATIVE INT ST
  • [4] Identity Under Construction: How Individuals Come to Define Themselves in Organizations
    Ashforth, Blake E.
    Schinoff, Beth S.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 3, 2016, 3 : 111 - 137
  • [5] UNDERSTANDING INDIVIDUAL COMPASSION IN ORGANIZATIONS: THE ROLE OF APPRAISALS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY
    Atkins, Paul W. B.
    Parker, Sharon K.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 37 (04) : 524 - 546
  • [6] Batson C.D., 2015, The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior, P259, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.023, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195399813.013.023]
  • [7] Empathy and Its Discontents
    Bloom, Paul
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [8] Who cares? Offering emotion work as a 'gift' in the nursing labour process
    Bolton, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2000, 32 (03) : 580 - 586
  • [9] Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136
  • [10] Costello A. B., 2005, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT, V10, P1, DOI [DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868, https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868]