A Method for Variance-Based Sensitivity Analysis of Cascading Failures

被引:2
作者
Leavy, Aaron S. C. [1 ]
Nakas, Georgios A. A. [1 ]
Papadopoulos, Panagiotis N. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Bldg, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Glasgow G1 1XW, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Power system protection; Power system faults; Relays; Power system dynamics; Power systems; Sensitivity analysis; Analytical models; Cascading failures; power system cascading failures; protection relay thresholds; sensitivity analysis; sensitivity indices; variance-based sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRD.2022.3199150
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Cascading failures of relay operations in power systems are inherently linked with the propagation of wide-area power system blackouts. In this paper, we consider a power system cascading failure as an indicator matrix encoding: what power system relays operated within a cascading failure inherently capturing the component and the sequence of tripping events. We propose that this matrix may then be used with extended forms of variance-based sensitivity estimators to quantitatively rank how sensitive observed power system cascading failures are to power system variables, considering overall system cascading failures as well as cascading failures grouped by network area and relay types. We demonstrate our proposed method by investigating the sensitivity of cascading failures to relay parameters, system conditions, and fault location using a version of the IEEE 39 bus model modified to include protection relays, wind farms, and tap-changing transformers. Input power system variables included: system operational scenario, disturbance location, relay parameters or thresholds. The Case Studies' results confirm the method's utility by successfully generating relative rankings of input variables' importance with respect to cascading failure propagation. The results also show cascading failures' sensitivity to input variables to be high due to non-linear relationships between input variables and cascading failures.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 474
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Variance-based sensitivity analysis with the uncertainties of the input variables and their distribution parameters
    Wang, Pan
    Lu, Zhenzhou
    Xiao, Sinan
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2018, 47 (04) : 1103 - 1125
  • [32] Modification of Variance-Based Sensitivity Indices for Stochastic Evaluation of Monitoring Measures
    Sanio, David
    Ahrens, Mark Alexander
    Mark, Peter
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2021, 6 (11)
  • [33] Operating rules for hydro-photovoltaic systems: A variance-based sensitivity analysis
    Yang, Zhikai
    Liu, Pan
    Xia, Qian
    Li, He
    Cheng, Qian
    Cheng, Lei
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 372
  • [35] A comparison of approximation techniques for variance-based sensitivity analysis of biochemical reaction systems
    Hong-Xuan Zhang
    John Goutsias
    BMC Bioinformatics, 11
  • [36] Variance-based global sensitivity analysis and beyond in life cycle assessment: an application to geothermal heating networks
    Marc Jaxa-Rozen
    Astu Sam Pratiwi
    Evelina Trutnevyte
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1008 - 1026
  • [37] Impacts of Operating Characteristics on Sensitivity of Power Grids to Cascading Failures
    Rahnamay-Naeini, Mahshid
    Hayat, Majeed M.
    2016 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2016,
  • [38] Detecting Asset Cascading Failures Using Complex Network Analysis
    Moffatt, Jaymin
    Zaitouny, Ayham
    Hodkiewicz, Melinda R.
    Small, Michael
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 120624 - 120637
  • [39] Variance-based global sensitivity analysis for rear-end crash investigation using deep learning
    Moussa, Ghada S.
    Owais, Mahmoud
    Dabbour, Essam
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 165
  • [40] Variance-based global sensitivity analysis and beyond in life cycle assessment: an application to geothermal heating networks
    Jaxa-Rozen, Marc
    Pratiwi, Astu Sam
    Trutnevyte, Evelina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (05) : 1008 - 1026