Loss aversion in the control of attention

被引:4
作者
Kim, Sunghyun [1 ]
Beck, Melissa R. [2 ]
Cho, Yang Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Sch Psychol, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Baton Rouge, LA USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Loss aversion; Prospect theory; Attentional control; BOTTOM-UP; TOP-DOWN; ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; PROSPECT-THEORY; RISK-TAKING; DECISIONS; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-023-02287-1
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Loss aversion is a psychological bias where an increase in loss is perceived as being larger than an equivalent increase in gain. In the present study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether attentional control reflects loss aversion. Participants performed a visual search task. On each trial, a red target and a green target were presented simultaneously, and participants were free to search for either one. Participants always gained points when they searched for a gain color target (e.g., red). However, they gained or lost points when they searched for a gain-loss color target (e.g., green). In Experiment 1, the expected values of the gain color and the gain-loss color were equal. Therefore, for maximizing the reward, participants did not need to preferably search for a particular color. However, results showed that participants searched for the gain color target more than the gain-loss color target, suggesting stronger attentional control for the gain color than the gain-loss color. In Experiment 2, even though the expected value of the gain-loss color was greater than that of the gain color, attention was allocated to the gain color more than to the gain-loss color. The results imply that attentional control can operate in accordance with the loss aversion principle when the boundary conditions for loss aversion in a repeated binary decision-making task were met.
引用
收藏
页码:1887 / 1894
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The past, present, and future of selection history [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Kim, Haena ;
Kim, Andy J. ;
Liao, Ming-Ray ;
Mrkonja, Lana ;
Clement, Andrew ;
Gregoire, Laurent .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2021, 130 :326-350
[2]   Relating Attentional Biases for Stimuli Associated with Social Reward and Punishment to Autistic Traits [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Kim, Haena .
COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 4 (01)
[3]   Linking dopaminergic reward signals to the development of attentional bias: A positron emission tomographic study [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Kuwabara, Hiroto ;
Wong, Dean F. ;
Roberts, Joshua ;
Rahmim, Arman ;
Brasic, James R. ;
Courtney, Susan M. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 157 :27-33
[4]   The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection [J].
Anderson, Brian A. .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 1369 :24-39
[5]   The Role of Dopamine in Value-Based Attentional Orienting [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Kuwabara, Hiroto ;
Wong, Dean F. ;
Gean, Emily G. ;
Rahmim, Arman ;
Brasic, James R. ;
George, Noble ;
Frolov, Boris ;
Courtney, Susan M. ;
Yantis, Steven .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) :550-555
[6]   Persistence of Value-Driven Attentional Capture [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2013, 39 (01) :6-9
[7]   Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Laurent, Patryk A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11)
[8]  
Armel KC, 2008, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V3, P396
[9]   Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy [J].
Awh, Edward ;
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) :437-443
[10]   Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment [J].
Barberis, Nicholas C. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 27 (01) :173-195