The Kantian case against democracy

被引：0

作者：

Harel, Alon ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Law, Jerusalem, Israel

[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Federmann Ctr Rational, Jerusalem, Israel

来源：

CRITICAL REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY | 2023年 / 26卷 / 02期

关键词：

Kant; democracy; legitimacy; representation;

D O I：

10.1080/13698230.2022.2133828

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

Contrary to what Cordelli argues, the relationship between Kantian legitimacy and democratic decision-making is contingent rather than necessary. This paper counters the connection between Kantian legitimacy and democracy in three ways: by arguing that democratic authorization is (i) not necessary, (ii) not sufficient, and indeed may be (iii) detrimental to, legitimate governance.

引用

页码：243 / 250

页数：8

共 6 条

[1]

Dorfman A, 2021, CAMBRIDGE HDB PRIVAT

[2] Against Privatisation As Such [J].

Dorfman, Avihay ;

Harel, Alon .

OXFORD JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2016, 36 (02) :400-427

[3] The Case Against Privatization [J].

Dorfman, Avihay ;

Harel, Alon .

PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2013, 41 (01) :67-102

[4]

Madison James., 1787, Federalist, V10

[5] Rethinking representation [J].

Mansbridge, J .

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2003, 97 (04) :515-528

[6] Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy [J].

Rehfeld, Andrew .

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2009, 103 (02) :214-230

← 1 →