Estimation of self and ternary interaction coefficients in solid Fe-C, Fe-Mn, Fe-Mn-C and Fe-Si-C alloys at 1623 K

被引:0
作者
Moharana, Niraja [1 ]
Ghosh, Dinabandhu [1 ]
机构
[1] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Kolkata, India
关键词
Activity coefficients; Interaction coefficients in solid Fe-base alloys; Quadratic solution model; Thermo-Calc software; Temperature dependence of activity coefficients; Fe-Mn-C and Fe-Si-C pseudobinaries; THERMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1080/00084433.2022.2055253
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Most reported interaction coefficients of solutes, epsilon(j)(i), and activity coefficients of solutes at their zero concentration, gamma(0)(i), in Fe-based systems have been measured in liquid solutions. In comparison, the data with solid iron-base alloys are meager. Utilising the Thermo-Calc generated equilibrium compositions of the coexisting liquid iron and austenite in Fe-C and Fe-Mn binaries, and Fe-C-Mn and Fe-C-Si pseudobinaries, and the first-principle activity relationship of each solute in the two phases at equilibrium, seven important thermodynamic data (epsilon(C)(C), gamma(0)(Mn), epsilon(Mn)(Mn), epsilon(Mn)(C), gamma(0)(Si), epsilon(Si)(Si), and epsilon(Si)(C)) in solid iron at 1623 K have been generated in this work. A quadratic solution model for the activity coefficient (gamma(i)) vs. composition (x(i)) relation is employed. The published values of the gamma(0)(C) in solid iron, and the interaction coefficients and gamma(0)(i)'s in liquid iron are used, after temperature corrections. For this purpose, the temperature dependences of interaction coefficients and activity coefficients have been formulated under the simplifying condition of ideal entropy of mixing. The reliability of the current method of evaluation of data has been verified by comparing the calculated value of gamma(0)(C) in solid iron with the experimental data. The generated data are as follows: epsilon(C)(C)(gamma) = -5.85, gamma(0)(Mn) (gamma) = 1.63, epsilon(Mn)(Mn) (gamma) = -1.05, epsilon(Mn)(C)(gamma) -5.79, gamma(0)(Si)(gamma) = 0.002, epsilon(Si)(Si)(gamma) = 38.50 and epsilon(si)(C) (gamma) = 4.41.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 179
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Fe-based alloys and their shielding properties against directly and indirectly ionizing radiation by using FLUKA simulations
    Al-Buriahi, M. S.
    Gaikwad, D. K.
    Hegazy, H. H.
    Sriwunkum, Chahkrit
    Neffati, R.
    [J]. PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2021, 96 (04)
  • [2] Mechanical and radiation shielding properties of tellurite glasses doped with ZnO and NiO
    Al-Buriahi, M. S.
    Bakhsh, Esraa M.
    Tonguc, Baris
    Khan, Sher Bahadar
    [J]. CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 46 (11) : 19078 - 19083
  • [3] Synthesis, physical and nuclear shielding properties of novel Pb-Al alloys
    Alzahrani, Jamila S.
    Alrowaili, Z. A.
    Saleh, H. H.
    Hammoud, Alaa
    Alomairy, Sultan
    Sriwunkum, C.
    Al-Buriahi, M. S.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 142
  • [4] Simulating the radiation shielding properties of TeO2-Na2O-TiO glass system using PHITS Monte Carlo code
    Alzahrani, Jamila S.
    Alothman, Miysoon A.
    Eke, Canel
    Al-Ghamdi, Hanan
    Aloraini, Dalal Abdulldh
    Al-Buriahi, M. S.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2021, 196
  • [5] DARKEN LS, 1967, T METALL SOC AIME, V239, P80
  • [6] DARKEN LS, 1967, T METALL SOC AIME, V239, P90
  • [7] Thermodynamic assessment of the Fe-Mn-C system
    Djurovic, Dejan
    Hallstedt, Bengt
    von Appen, Jorg
    Dronskowski, Richard
    [J]. CALPHAD-COMPUTER COUPLING OF PHASE DIAGRAMS AND THERMOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 35 (04): : 479 - 491
  • [8] Elliott JF., 1963, THERMOCHEMISTRY STEE, V2, P564
  • [9] A Derivation of a Quadratic Activity Coefficient vs Composition Relationship in a Quaternary System, A-B-C-D
    Ghosh, Dinabandhu
    [J]. METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS B-PROCESS METALLURGY AND MATERIALS PROCESSING SCIENCE, 2010, 41 (06): : 1274 - 1283
  • [10] Thermodynamic Assessment of the Fe-Mn-O System
    Kjellqvist, Lina
    Selleby, Malin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHASE EQUILIBRIA AND DIFFUSION, 2010, 31 (02) : 113 - 134