How does the environmental protection tax law affect firm ESG? Evidence from the Chinese stock markets

被引:69
作者
He, Yu [1 ]
Zhao, Xiaoling [1 ]
Zheng, Huan [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Finance, 19 Xuefu Rd, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 66 Xuefu Rd, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental protection tax law; Environmental; social; and governance; Difference -in -differences method; Porter hypothesis; Heavily polluting firms; Chinese stock markets; AIR-POLLUTION; POLICY; COMPETITIVENESS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107067
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The serious environmental pollution problem has been proven to harm people's health and economic development in China. Chinese authorities implemented the Environmental Protection Tax Law (EPTL) in 2018-the first environmental tax law in this country-to solve the problem. Since firms are main objects of this policy, its effect on firms' sustainable development capacity is a worthwhile but not yet discussed question. Therefore, this study adopts the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) to quantify firms' sustainable development capacity and employs the difference-in-differences method to investigate the above research question using a sample of A shares listed in Chinese stock markets from 2014 to 2021. Benchmark regression and robustness tests demonstrated that the EPTL could promote heavily polluting firms' ESG, thus, confirming the Porter hypothesis' existence in China from a micro perspective. We conducted a series of additional tests to provide insight into the effects of the EPTL under different circumstances, and achieved the following important findings: a) although a time-lag effect exists, the policy effect increases over time; b) the boosting effect of this policy is stronger on higher ESG firms than on lower ESG firms; c) innovation compensation effect and government financial subsidies can exponentially increase the EPTL's effect on firm ESG; and d) this policy has an inhibiting effect on politically connected firm's ESG. Based on these findings, we provide theoretical and practical suggestions for academia and policymakers. The Chinese authorities should insist on enforcing the EPTL in the long run, encourage firms on research and development investments, and provide them more financial subsidies, so as to enhance the policy's effect. Moreover, the government should implement some supporting policies to improve the sustainable development capacity of politically connected firms.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Buchetti B., 2022, SYSTEMATIC LIT REV C, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.4286866, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4286866]
[2]   Do Boards Take Environmental, Social, and Governance Issues Seriously? Evidence from Media Coverage and CEO Dismissals [J].
Burke, Jenna J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2022, 176 (04) :647-671
[3]   How does environmental regulation influence enterprises' total factor productivity? A quasi-natural experiment based on China's new environmental protection law [J].
Cai, Wugan ;
Ye, Peiyun .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 276
[4]   Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China [J].
Chen, Shimin ;
Sun, Zheng ;
Tang, Song ;
Wu, Donghui .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2011, 17 (02) :259-271
[5]   Environmental regulation and ESG of SMEs in China: Porter hypothesis re-tested [J].
Chen, Yiu Por ;
Zhuo, Zihan ;
Huang, Zeying ;
Li, Wanxin .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 850
[6]   Research on the Green Technology Innovation Cultivation Path of Manufacturing Enterprises Under the Regulation of Environmental Protection Tax Law in China [J].
Chen, Yongqing ;
Zhang, Tongjian ;
Ostic, Dragana .
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
[7]   How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Corporate Environmental Investment? Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises [J].
Cheng, Zhice ;
Chen, Xinyuan ;
Wen, Huwei .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (05)
[8]   Peering through the smokescreen: ESG disclosure and CEO personality [J].
Dabbebi, Ahlem ;
Lassoued, Naima ;
Khanchel, Imen .
MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2022, 43 (07) :3147-3164
[9]   Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets [J].
Disli, Mustafa ;
Yilmaz, Mustafa Kemal ;
Mohamed, Farah Finn Mohamud .
SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (04) :929-952
[10]   Government's awareness of Environmental protection and corporate green innovation: A natural experiment from the new environmental protection law in China [J].
Fang, Zhenming ;
Kong, Xiaoran ;
Sensoy, Ahmet ;
Cui, Xin ;
Cheng, Feiyang .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2021, 70 :294-312