A comparison of two techniques of internal jugular vein cannulation: Landmark-guided technique versus ultrasound-guided technique

被引:0
作者
Davis, Josemine [1 ,6 ]
Dwivedi, Deepak [2 ]
Sawhney, Sadhan [3 ]
Rai, Amit [1 ]
Dua, Amit [4 ]
Singh, Satyen Kumar [5 ]
机构
[1] Command Hosp Western Command, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Chandigarh, India
[2] Command Hosp Eastern Command, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Kolkata, India
[3] Command Hosp Southern Command, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Pune, India
[4] Army Hosp R&R, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[5] Base Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Lucknow, India
[6] Command Hosp Western Command Chandimandir, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Panchkula, Haryana, India
关键词
Cannulation; central venous catheterization; jugular vein; landmark; ultrasonography; CENTRAL VENOUS CANNULATION; COMPLICATIONS; CATHETERIZATION; PLACEMENT; INSERTION; ARTERIAL; GUIDANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.4103/jmms.jmms_13_22
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: This study was designed to compare the overall success rates and complications of two techniques of internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization, namely the landmark (LM)-based technique and ultrasound (US)-guided technique in a heterogeneous Indian population at an Armed Forces Tertiary Care Hospital. Methods: Ninety consenting patients were assigned to two groups: LM and US groups. Patients with known coagulation abnormalities, body mass index > 30, infection at the insertion site, known vascular abnormalities, burn contractures, and other dermatologic conditions that precluded an LM technique were excluded. Central venous catheterizations during the code blue scenarios were excluded due to the emergent nature of the procedure. Three operators from the author group with requisite experience in LM and US techniques performed the 90 catheterizations. In LM group, a finder needle with a 2 ml syringe was used to aspirate venous blood from the IJV. A 16G needle was guided in the same direction as the finder needle till venous blood was aspirated, followed by guidewire insertion and cannulation. In the US group, a 6-12 MHz linear US probe was used to identify the IJV in real time and a 16G needle was used to access the IJV under US guidance in the cross-sectional view. Results: The overall success rate was 84.4% in LM group and 100% in US group (P = 0.0059). The first attempt success rate was similar in both groups (71.1% and 86.6%, P = 0.07). The overall complication rates in LM group were 20%, whereas complications in the US group were 2.2% (P = 0.0073). Notably, vascular complications occurred less frequently in US group with fewer arterial punctures and hematomas. Hemothorax and pneumothorax did not occur in any group. The mean cannulation time decreased by 69 s, i.e., from 276 s in the LM group to 207 s in the US group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: US-guided central venous catheter insertion to IJV improves the overall success rate and reduces cannulation time as compared to conventional LM-based technique.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 36
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Absence of the Right Internal Jugular Vein During Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation
    Alagoz, Ali
    Tunc, Mehtap
    Sazak, Hilal
    Pehlivanoglu, Polat
    Gokcek, Atila
    Ulus, Fatma
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2015, 43 (03) : 212 - 214
  • [32] Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein in robotic cardiac surgery
    Wang Yao
    Wang Gang
    Gao Chang-qing
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (13) : 2414 - 2417
  • [33] Retrospective comparison of two different approaches for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation in hemodialysis patients
    Treglia, Antonio
    Musone, Dario
    Amoroso, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2017, 18 (01) : 43 - 46
  • [34] Percutaneous ultrasound-guided central venous catheters: the lateral in-plane technique for internal jugular vein access
    Rossi, Umberto G.
    Rigamonti, Paolo
    Ticha, Vladimira
    Zoffoli, Elena
    Giordano, Antonino
    Gallieni, Maurizio
    Cariati, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2014, 15 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [35] Safety of a training program for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in critically ill patients
    Dexheimer Neto, Felippe Leopoldo
    Roehrig, Cintia
    Morandii, Paola
    de Oliveira, Roselaine Pinheiro
    Teixeira, Cassiano
    Maccari, Jucara Gasparetto
    da Silva Alencastro, Andre Luiz
    Albuquerque, Regis Bueno
    Oliveira, Eubrando Silvestre
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2011, 57 (04): : 394 - 397
  • [36] Does ultrasound imaging before puncture facilitate internal jugular vein cannulation? Prospective randomized comparison with landmark-guided puncture in ventilated patients
    Hayashi, H
    Amano, M
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2002, 16 (05) : 572 - 575
  • [37] Comparison of external jugular vein-based surface landmark approach and ultrasound-guided approach for internal jugular venous cannulation: A randomised crossover clinical trial
    Vinayagamurugan, Arunagiri
    Badhe, Ashok Shankar
    Jha, Ajay Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (03)
  • [38] Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark-Based Subclavian Vein Access
    Gottlieb, Michael
    Reyes, Daniel
    Casteel, Christian
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 82 (05) : 627 - 629
  • [39] In reply: Ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation: a novel technique for confirming that the guidewire is directed towards the right atrium
    Kazuyoshi Aoyama
    Ichiro Takenaka
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2016, 63 : 364 - 364
  • [40] Conventional Landmark-Guided Midline Versus Preprocedure Ultrasound-Guided Paramedian Techniques in Spinal Anesthesia
    Srinivasan, Karthikeyan Kallidaikurichi
    Iohom, Gabriella
    Loughnane, Frank
    Lee, Peter J.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 121 (04) : 1089 - 1096