From behind the scenes to the forefront: how do intermediaries lead the construction of international innovation ecosystems?

被引:3
作者
Chen, Xiaojuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He, Zheng [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Tingting [1 ,2 ]
Xiang, Guangming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China UESTC, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Ctr Israel Studies UESTC, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] 2006 Xiyuan Ave,West Hitech Zone, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Intermediaries; international innovation ecosystem; social capital; longitudinal case study; ORGANIZATIONS; GOVERNMENT; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2023.2182614
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
While previous literature on international innovation ecosystems (IIEs) construction focuses on the leading role of high-tech corporations, the intermediaries which were thought of as playing auxiliary and supporting roles have long been ignored. This study intends to fill this gap by exploring how an intermediary organisation initiates and constructs an IIE as a focal actor from the perspective of social capital. Combining a longitudinal case study and grounded theory, we investigate the construction process of the China-Israel innovation ecosystem established by Infinity Group (IG), an Israeli private equity firm with a base in China that acts as a leading role in connecting innovation cooperation between the two countries. Our findings show that structural capital acts as a fundamental element from the emergence of the ecosystem to its mature stage. Specifically, this study suggests that culture embeddedness influences the diffusion of trust, and trust further leads the network change to a small-world structure, during which intermediaries can act as leading actors to overcome the challenges during the IIE building process. Our study enriches the literature on international innovation ecosystem and provides some practical implications for the construction of intermediary-oriented IIEs.
引用
收藏
页码:2969 / 2984
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Social capital: Prospects for a new concept [J].
Adler, PS ;
Kwon, SW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (01) :17-40
[2]   Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy [J].
Adner, Ron .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (01) :39-58
[3]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[4]  
Lozano VA, 2019, INT REV SOCIOL, V29, P1, DOI 10.1080/03906701.2019.1609747
[5]   Researching ecosystems in innovation contexts [J].
Autio, Erkko ;
Thomas, Llewellyn D. W. .
INNOVATION & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 19 (01) :12-25
[6]   The role of public open innovation intermediaries in local government and the public sector [J].
Bakici, Tuba ;
Almirall, Esteve ;
Wareham, Jonathan .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2013, 25 (03) :311-327
[7]   BUILDING BRIDGES FOR INNOVATION - THE ROLE OF CONSULTANTS IN TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER [J].
BESSANT, J ;
RUSH, H .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1995, 24 (01) :97-114
[8]   Blind date? Intermediaries as matchmakers on the way to start-up-industry coopetition [J].
Blanka, Christine ;
Traunmueller, Verena .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 90 :1-13
[9]   On Network Theory [J].
Borgatti, Stephen P. ;
Halgin, Daniel S. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (05) :1168-1181
[10]   The network structure of social capital [J].
Burt, RS .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 22, 2000: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2000, 22 :345-423