Novel perspectives for multi-actor collaboration in strategic environmental assessment using ST4S

被引:9
作者
Partidario, Maria [1 ,3 ]
Monteiro, Margarida B. [2 ]
Martins, Rute [1 ]
机构
[1] Tecn Univ Lisboa, Ctr Innovat Terr Urbanism & Architecture CiTUA, Ave Rovisco Pais, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, CEGIST, Inst Super Tecn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Lisbon, Dept Civil Engn Architecture & Georesources, Inst Super Tecn, Ave Rovisco Pais, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Strategic environmental assessment; Strategic thinking for sustainability (ST4S); Collaboration; Multi; -actor; Boundary spanning; Innovation; GOVERNANCE; ROLES; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The literature on strategic environmental assessment (SEA) reveals a growing number of scholars suggesting that SEA faces challenges, notably in terms of its capacity to support collaborative processes. One possible reason for this to happen relates to practice being saturated with standardized procedures that proffered SEA as a 'night watchman' on conventional impact-based conceptions. Such conceptions are mostly technocratic, leaving limited space for research-practitioners collaboration, and also small room for change provided they are legally well established. This article aims to show that adopting a more strategic thinking approach in conceptualizing and practicing SEA may increase opportunities for collaborative governance. Strategic thinking for sustainability (ST4S) is an innovative approach that can be used with SEA but also with other policy-making and planning assessment contexts and processes. It is strongly supported upon principles of governance, revealing a great capacity to promote multi-actor collaboration across institutional and disciplinary boundaries. We ground our research in the cross-fields of power, institutional and relational perspectives. We consider a multi-actor perspective to understand the potential of ST4S to promote relationships between different actors in a deci-sion process and understand their institutional logics within processes of development. We also consider the notion of boundary spanning within ST4S to understand how collaborative practices (and potentials) can aim for cross-boundary work. We illustrate our analysis with concrete cases that used an ST4S approach (a SEA in Portugal and Peru, and a sustainability strategy in Portugal) to reflect on the challenging 'relational turn' needed for lasting collaborative practices.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Ahmed K, 2008, ENVIRON DEV, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-6762-9
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Strategic environmental assessment in policy and sector reform: conceptual model and operational guidance
[3]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[4]  
Argyris C., 1996, ORG LEARNING
[5]   Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Wittmayer, Julia M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) :628-649
[6]  
Backstrand K., 2003, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V3, P24, DOI [DOI 10.1162/152638003322757916, 10.1162/152638003322757916]
[7]   Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface: the practitioners' perspectives [J].
Bednarek, A. T. ;
Wyborn, C. ;
Cvitanovic, C. ;
Meyer, R. ;
Colvin, R. M. ;
Addison, P. F. E. ;
Close, S. L. ;
Curran, K. ;
Farooque, M. ;
Goldman, E. ;
Hart, D. ;
Mannix, H. ;
McGreavy, B. ;
Parris, A. ;
Posner, S. ;
Robinson, C. ;
Ryan, M. ;
Leith, P. .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (04) :1175-1183
[8]   Implementing strategic environmental assessment in countries of the global South - An analysis within the Peruvian context [J].
Biehl, Juliane ;
Koeppel, Johann ;
Rodorff, Verena ;
Perez, Maria Elena Huesca ;
Zimmermann, Annegret ;
Geissler, Gesa ;
Rehhausen, Anke .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2019, 77 :23-39
[9]   A game theory perspective on environmental assessment: What games are played and what does this tell us about decision making rationality and legitimacy? [J].
Bond, Alan ;
Pope, Jenny ;
Morrison-Saunders, Angus ;
Retief, Francois .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2016, 57 :187-194
[10]   Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management [J].
Bouwen, R ;
Taillieu, T .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) :137-153