On-Orbit Magnetometer Data Calibration Using Genetic Algorithm and Interchangeability of the Calibration Parameters

被引:1
作者
Withanage, Dulani Chamika [1 ]
Teramoto, Mariko [1 ]
Cho, Mengu [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Inst Technol, Lab Lean Satellite Enterprises & Inorbit Expt LaSE, Kitakyushu 8048550, Japan
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
CubeSats; magnetometer; on-orbit data; calibration; genetic algorithm;
D O I
10.3390/app13116742
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Magnetometers are important sensors with applications in the attitude determination and control systems of satellites. CubeSats have certain limitations related to power, mass, and volume. Due to this, CubeSat magnetometers are not separated from other electrical circuits inside the satellite. Thus, it is important to calibrate the magnetometer, simulating operating conditions while the satellite is running before the launch. However, due to the limited facilities, not every CubeSat is able to calibrate its magnetometers properly on the ground. This study focuses on the calibration of on-orbit magnetometer data observed by BIRDS-3 CubeSats with a genetic algorithm. High oscillations in the total magnetic field were found in the on-orbit magnetic field data measured by magnetometers inside BIRDS-3 CubeSats. Nine unknowns, scaling factors, non-orthogonal angles, and offsets are identified with the genetic algorithm. This paper discusses the factors that affect the high oscillations in the measured total magnetic field data. For the calibration, we used magnetic field data similar to those of a model magnetic field, as the deviation is smaller. This paper presents the accuracy of determining unknowns using the genetic algorithm, as well as the interchangeability of the answers with additional orbit data from the same satellite. This method can be used in the future to calibrate magnetometers inside CubeSats before or after launch.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], World Magnetic Model - Home Page
  • [2] [Anonymous], USUK WORLD MAGNETIC
  • [3] Bangert P., 2014, P 2 IAA C DYN CONTR
  • [4] Bottcher M., 2016, IOP C SERIES MAT SCI, VVolume 152, P012029
  • [5] Chamika W.D., 2019, P 70 INT ASTR C
  • [6] Magnetometer Calibration Using Genetic Algorithms
    Chekhov, Egor L.
    Antonov, Dmitry A.
    Kolganov, Leonid A.
    Savkin, Aleksey, V
    [J]. TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2020, 9 (03): : 907 - 914
  • [7] Coley D.A., 1999, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms for Scientists and Engineers, DOI DOI 10.1142/3904
  • [8] Extension of a Two-Step Calibration Methodology to Include Nonorthogonal Sensor Axes
    Foster, C. C.
    Elkaim, G. H.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2008, 44 (03) : 1070 - 1078
  • [9] GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, US
  • [10] Choosing Mutation and Crossover Ratios for Genetic Algorithms-A Review with a New Dynamic Approach
    Hassanat, Ahmad
    Almohammadi, Khalid
    Alkafaween, Esra'a
    Abunawas, Eman
    Hammouri, Awni
    Prasath, V. B. Surya
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2019, 10 (12)