Clinical benefits and economic cost-savings of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention

被引:5
|
作者
Cowan, Robert [1 ]
Stark-Inbar, Alit [2 ]
Rabany, Liron [2 ]
Harris, Dagan [2 ]
Vizel, Maya [2 ]
Ironi, Alon [2 ]
Vieira, Julio R. R. [3 ,4 ]
Galen, Michelle [5 ]
Treppendahl, Christina [6 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Div Headache Med, Palo Alto, CA USA
[2] Theranica Ltd, Ha Omanut 4, Netanya, Israel
[3] Nuvance Hlth Neurosci Inst, Kingston, NY USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Saul R Korey Dept Neurol, Bronx, NY USA
[5] Deaconess Res Inst, Newburgh, IN USA
[6] Headache Neurol Res Inst, Ridgeland, MS USA
关键词
Prevention; migraine; headache; health economics; cost-benefit; HEOR; employers; remote electrical neuromodulation; REN; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RESOURCE UTILIZATION; EPISODIC MIGRAINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; BURDEN; IMPACT; PAIN; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2023.2205751
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Migraine affects more than 1 billion people worldwide, causing significant disability and substantial clinical economic burden. Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) is a prescribed, wearable, non-pharmacological, non-invasive device (Nerivio), indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years and older. Efficacy of REN for migraine prevention was recently demonstrated in a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical-trial. This study further analyzes clinical benefits from endpoints measured in the clinical-trial as well as their associated direct and indirect costs. Out of 248 subjects randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), 179 (95:84) qualified for modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Significant therapeutic gains favoring REN over placebo were found, including an average reduction of 3.4 acute medication days/month, and an average reduction of 2.7 presenteeism days/month. A reduction in the number of provider visits and absenteeism days was also reported, though not significantly differed from changes in the control group. Mean annual cost-saving from reductions in these four clinical outcomes relative to baseline without REN treatment for a patient using REN for migraine prevention estimated $10,000. Extrapolated to a hypothetical US commercial health-plan of one million covered lives, annual mean cost-saving from using REN for migraine prevention is estimated to be $560.0 million, composed of $327.8 million direct costs and $232.2 million indirect costs. Thus, REN preventive treatment for migraine reduces disease burden and leads to meaningful cost-saving, both direct and indirect, proposing clinical and financial incentives for patients, health insurance systems, and employers to utilize REN for migraine prevention. Aims Assess the clinical benefits and associated direct and indirect cost-savings from Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention. Methods REN, a prescribed, wearable, FDA-cleared neuromodulation-device for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine, recently demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention when used every-other-day, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study. Following baseline (4-weeks), subjects underwent treatment with REN or placebo (8-weeks), and electronically reported migraine symptoms and acute treatments daily. Therapeutic-gain was the between-groups difference (REN minus placebo) in change from baseline to the second month of intervention. Health-economics impact was derived as cost-savings associated with REN's clinical benefits. Results Out of 248 subjects randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), 179 (95:84) qualified for modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Significant therapeutic gains favoring REN vs. placebo were found (Tepper et al. 2023), including mean (+/- SD) reduction in number of acute medication days (3.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.5; gain = 2.2; p = .001) and presenteeism days (2.7 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.4; gain = 1.6, p = .001). Mean changes of provider visits (reduction of 0.09 +/- 0.1 vs. increase of 0.08 +/- 0.2; p = .297), and reduction of absenteeism days (0.07 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.07 +/- 0.2; p = .997) were not significant. Mean annual cost-saving for one patient using REN for migraine prevention estimated $10,000 (+/-$1,777) from reductions in these four clinical outcomes relative to baseline without REN treatment. Extrapolated to a hypothetical US commercial health-plan of one-million covered lives, assuming the national prevalence of migraine patients on preventive treatment, annual mean (+/- SE) cost-saving from using REN migraine prevention estimated $560.0 million (+/-$99.5 million) from reduction in direct (similar to$330 millionm) and indirect costs (similar to$230 millionm) measured. Limitations Clinical and cost-savings benefits presented are conservative, assessed only from endpoints measured in the clinical trial. Moreover, some of the endpoints had only scarce or no occurrences during the study period. Conclusions Coverage of the REN-device for migraine prevention may significantly reduce disease-burden and save a one-million-member payer plan at least $560 million per year.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 664
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Efficacy and safety of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention in adolescents: Interim results of a real-world study
    Lax, D. N.
    Rabany, L.
    Shmuely, S.
    Asmar, Y.
    Stark-Inbar, A.
    Ironi, A.
    Monteith, T.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2025, 96 : S78 - S78
  • [22] Incorporating Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) Into Usual Care Reduces Acute Migraine Medication Use: An Open-Label Extension Study
    Marmura, Michael J.
    Lin, Tamar
    Harris, Dagan
    Ironi, Alon
    Rosen, Noah L.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [23] A model to estimate cost-savings in diabetic foot ulcer prevention efforts
    Barshes, Neal R.
    Saedi, Samira
    Wrobel, James
    Kougias, Panos
    Kundakcioglu, O. Erhun
    Armstrong, David G.
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2017, 31 (04) : 700 - 707
  • [24] Effectiveness comparison of remote electrical neuromodulation and standard-care medications for acute treatment of chronic migraine: a post-hoc analysis
    Grosberg, Brian
    Rabany, Liron
    Vizel, Maya
    Ironi, Alon
    Harris, Dagan
    Stark-Inbar, Alit
    Smith, Timothy R.
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2022, 12 (07) : 837 - 844
  • [25] Acute Treatment of Migraine in Pre-Adolescents: Real-World Analysis of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)
    Stark-Inbar, A.
    Werner, K.
    Gerson, T.
    Shmuely, S.
    Ironi, A.
    Rao, R.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 94 : S137 - S137
  • [26] Remote Electrical Neuromodulation for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Patients with Chronic Migraine: An Open-Label Pilot Study
    Nierenburg, Hida
    Vieira, Julio R.
    Lev, Nirit
    Lin, Tamar
    Harris, Dagan
    Vizel, Maya
    Ironi, Alon
    Lewis, Bryan
    Wright, Paul
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2020, 9 (02) : 531 - 543
  • [27] What are the cost-savings and health benefits of improving detection and management for six high cardiovascular risk conditions in England? An economic evaluation
    Thomas, Chloe
    Brennan, Alan
    Goka, Edward
    Squires, Hazel Y.
    Brenner, Gilly
    Bagguley, David
    Buckley Woods, Helen
    Gillett, Michael
    Leaviss, Joanna
    Clowes, Mark
    Heathcote, Laura
    Cooper, Katy
    Breeze, Penny
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [28] Real-world Evidence of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Children Aged 6-11
    Werner, K. W.
    Gerson, T. G.
    Stark-Inbar, A. I.
    Shmuely, S. S.
    Ironi, A. I.
    Garas, S. G.
    Szperka, C. S.
    Hershey, A. H.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2025, 96 : S77 - S77
  • [29] Safety and efficacy of remote electrical neuromodulation for the acute treatment of chronic migraine: an open-label study
    Grosberg, Brian
    Rabany, Liron
    Lin, Tamar
    Harris, Dagan
    Vizel, Maya
    Ironi, Alon
    O'Carroll, Christopher P.
    Schim, Jack
    PAIN REPORTS, 2021, 6 (04) : E966
  • [30] Remote Electrical Neuromodulation for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Patients with Chronic Migraine: An Open-Label Pilot Study
    Hida Nierenburg
    Julio R. Vieira
    Nirit Lev
    Tamar Lin
    Dagan Harris
    Maya Vizel
    Alon Ironi
    Bryan Lewis
    Paul Wright
    Pain and Therapy, 2020, 9 : 531 - 543