A consensus statement on minimum operational standards for geriatric emergency care in Belgium: a modified Delphi study

被引:4
作者
Heeren, Pieter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Islam, Farah [1 ,4 ]
Desruelles, Didier [5 ,6 ]
Flamaing, Johan [2 ,7 ]
Sabbe, Marc [5 ,6 ]
Milisen, Koen [1 ,2 ]
Heerinckx, Philippe
Hubloue, Ives
Tran, Tuan Long
Wynants, Stefan
Ghekiere, Veronique
De Brauwer, Isabelle
Beernaert, Laetitia
Cristelbach, Sophie
Guldemont, Sven
Lumen, Dieter
Sohet, Sebastien
Bogaerts, Emilie
Himschoot, Nadja
Michaux, Nicole
Dath, Mayelise
Biets, Robin
Piron, Cecile
van den Heede, Koen
Vande Voorde, Carine
Ricour, Celine
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Acad Ctr Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Kapucijnenvoer 35-4, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Geriatr Med, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Res Fdn Flanders, Egmontstraat 5, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Basel, Inst Nursing Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Bernoullistr 38, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Emergency Med, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[6] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Emergency Med, Kapucijnenvoer 35-4, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[7] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Gerontol & Geriatr, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Emergency department; Observation unit; Older adults; Geriatric emergency medicine; OLDER-PEOPLE; DEPARTMENTS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-023-04474-0
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BackgroundAs emergency department (ED) leaders started integrating geriatric emergency guidelines on a facultative basis, important variations have emerged between EDs in care for older patients. The aim of this study was to establish a consensus on minimum operational standards for Geriatric ED care in Belgium.MethodsA two-stage modified Delphi study was conducted. Twenty panellists were recruited from Dutch and French speaking regions in Belgium to join an interdisciplinary expert panel. In the first stage, an online survey was conducted to identify and define all possible elements of geriatric emergency care. In the second stage, an online survey and online expert panel meeting were organized consecutively to determine which elements should be recognized as minimum operational standards.ResultsBetween March 2020 and February 2021, the expert panel developed a broad consensus including ten statements focusing on the target population, specific goals, availability of geriatric practitioners and quality assurance. Additionally, the expert panel also determined which protocols, materials and accommodation criteria should be available in conventional EDs (39 standards) and in observational EDs (57 standards).ConclusionsThis study presents a consensus on minimum operational standards for geriatric emergency care in two ED types: the conventional ED and the observational ED. These findings may serve as a starting point towards broadly supported minimum standards of care stipulated by legislation in Belgium or other countries.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
American College of Emergency Physicians, 2021, Geriatric emergency department accreditation program
[2]   Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions [J].
Aminzadeh, F ;
Dalziel, WB .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 39 (03) :238-247
[3]  
Baeyens JP, 2010, J NUTR HEALTH AGING, V14, P474
[4]   Quality care for older people with urgent and emergency care needs in UK emergency departments [J].
Banerjee, Jay ;
Conroy, Simon ;
Cooke, Matthew W. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (09) :699-700
[5]   Observation Medicine: Providing Safe and Cost-Effective Care Beyond the Emergency Department Preface [J].
Baugh, Christopher W. ;
Wilkerson, R. Gentry .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 35 (03) :XVII-XVIII
[6]   The European curriculum for geriatric emergency medicine [J].
Bellou, Abdelouahab ;
Conroy, Simon P. ;
Graham, Colin A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (04) :239-239
[7]   Geriatric Screeners 2.0: Time for a Paradigm Shift in Emergency Department Vulnerability Research [J].
Carpenter, Christopher R. ;
Mooijaart, Simon P. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 68 (07) :1402-1405
[8]   Risk Factors and Screening Instruments to Predict Adverse Outcomes for Undifferentiated Older Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Carpenter, Christopher R. ;
Shelton, Erica ;
Fowler, Susan ;
Suffoletto, Brian ;
Platts-Mills, Timothy F. ;
Rothman, Richard E. ;
Hogan, Teresita M. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (01) :1-21
[9]   Optimal Older Adult Emergency Care: Introducing Multidisciplinary Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines From the American College of Emergency Physicians, American Geriatrics Society, Emergency Nurses Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [J].
Carpenter, Christopher R. ;
Bromley, Marilyn ;
Caterino, Jeffrey M. ;
Chun, Audrey ;
Gerson, Lowell W. ;
Greenspan, Jason ;
Hwang, Ula ;
John, David P. ;
Lyons, William L. ;
Platts-Mills, Timothy F. ;
Mortensen, Betty ;
Ragsdale, Luna ;
Rosenberg, Mark ;
Wilber, Scott .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (07) :806-809
[10]  
Clegg D., 1994, Case method fast-track: a RAD approach