Mainstreaming Nature-Based Solutions in City Planning: Examining Scale, Focus, and Visibility as Drivers of Intervention Success in Liverpool, UK

被引:6
作者
Mell, Ian [1 ]
Clement, Sarah [2 ]
OSullivan, Fearghus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Planning & Environm Management, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Sci, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Nature-Based Solutions; urban planning; community perceptions; urban nature; biodiversity; multi-functionality; climate change; green infrastructure; INFRASTRUCTURE; PRINCIPLES; FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE; POLICY; GREEN;
D O I
10.3390/land12071371
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nature-based solutions (NBS) have been central to the European Union's drive to address climate change, ecological degradation, and promote urban prosperity. Via an examination of the Horizon 2020-funded URBAN GreenUP project in Liverpool, this paper explores mainstreaming NBS in city planning. It uses evidence from pre- and post-intervention surveys with Liverpool residents and interviews with local business, environmental, government, and community sector experts to illustrate how a complex interplay of scale, location, focus, and visibility of NBS influences perceptions of the added value of NBS. This paper highlights the requirement that NBS interventions be bespoke and responsive to the overarching needs of residents and other stakeholders. Moreover, we underscore the importance of expert input into the design, location, and maintenance of NBS and call for these key drivers of successful delivery to be better integrated into work programs. This paper also notes that the type and size of NBS interventions impact perceptions of their value, with smaller projects being viewed as less socially and ecologically valuable compared to larger investments. We conclude that while small-scale NBS can support climatic, health, or ecological improvements in specific instances, strategic, larger-scale, and more visible investments are required to accrue substantive benefits and gain acceptance of NBS as a legitimate and effective planning tool.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] H2020 projects and EU research needs for nature-based adaptation solutions
    Al Sayah, Mario J.
    Versini, Pierre-Antoine
    Schertzer, Daniel
    [J]. URBAN CLIMATE, 2022, 44
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, National Planning Policy Framework
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on "Nature based solutions and re naturing cities."
  • [4] Austin G., 2014, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
  • [5] Benedict M., 2006, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
  • [6] IUCN and perspectives on biodiversity conservation in a changing world
    Beumer, Carijn
    Martens, Pim
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2013, 22 (13-14) : 3105 - 3120
  • [7] Building urban resilience with nature-based solutions: How can urban planning contribute?
    Bush, Judy
    Doyon, Andreanne
    [J]. CITIES, 2019, 95
  • [8] Nature-based solutions addressing the water-energy-food nexus: Review of theoretical concepts and urban case studies
    Carvalho, Pedro
    Finger, David Christian
    Masi, Fabio
    Cipolletta, Giulia
    Oral, Hasan Volkan
    Toth, Attila
    Regelsberger, Martin
    Exposito, Alfonso
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 338
  • [9] Clement S., 2021, GOVERNING ANTHR NOVE
  • [10] Clement S., 2023, SUSTAINABILITY TRANS