Grey level co-occurrence matrix and learning algorithms to quantify and classify use-wear on experimental flint tools

被引:7
作者
Sferrazza, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Landesamt Denkmalpflege & Archaol Sachsen Anhalt, Kleine Steinstr 7, D-06108 Halle, Saale, Germany
关键词
Use; -wear; Lithic-analysis; Grey level co -occurrence matrix; Experimental archaeology; Learning algorithms; SCANNING CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; FOCUS VARIATION MICROSCOPY; MICROWEAR TRACES; STONE TOOLS; QUANTIFICATION; METROLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.103869
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Today, the analysis of use-wear traces of archaeological artefacts uses both qualitative (traditional) and quan-titative (innovative) techniques. However, quantitative analyses require time and huge economic resources. It is important to find quantitative solutions that do not have high costs and that allow qualitative analysis to be more robust. Furthermore, quantitative analysis with 2D techniques would facilitate the standardization of the terms used to discriminate and describe the different types of polish.The Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix is a 2D image analysis technique that provides quantitative data on image texture. Although quite common in other research field, this technique has not been systematically applied in the archaeological research. Unlike other quantitative approaches this technique takes little time and has no cost, as it uses traditional 2D images. Futhermore, this method acts as a bridge between qualitative and quan-titative analyses. In this first approach, four use-wear traces (unused, butchering, shell, wood, antler) on flint experimental samples were analysed with selections of square images of 300x300 and 600x600 pixels (30 for each contact material).This technique together with a learning algorithm called Support Vector Machine has proved effective in distinguishing and quantifying four types of use-wear traces.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Adan M., 2003, The Digital Heritage of Archaeology. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, P126
[2]   Butchering or wood? A LSCM analysis to distinguish use-wear on stone tools [J].
Alvarez-Fernandez, Ana ;
Garcia-Gonzalez, Rebeca ;
Marquez, Belen ;
Miguel Carretero, Jose ;
Luis Arsuaga, Juan .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS, 2020, 31
[3]  
Anderson P., 1998, Functional Analysis of Lithic Artefacts: Current State of the Research, XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Workshops, VII, P1151
[4]  
Anderson P. A., 1981, THESIS BORDEAUX
[5]   Insights from a tribological analysis of the tribulum [J].
Anderson, P. C. ;
Georges, J. -M. ;
Vargiolu, R. ;
Zahouani, H. .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 33 (11) :1559-1568
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1898, B PALETNOLOGIA ITALI
[7]   Pitted stones in the Acheulean from Olduvai Gorge Beds III and IV (Tanzania): A use-wear and 3D approach [J].
Arroyo, Adrian ;
de la Torre, Ignacio .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2020, 145
[8]   AMBIGUOUS USE TRACES AND BLIND TEST-RESULTS - NEW DATA [J].
BAMFORTH, DB ;
BURNS, GR ;
WOODMAN, C .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1990, 17 (04) :413-430
[9]  
Barceló JA, 2001, BRIT ARCHAEOL REP IN, VS931, P69
[10]  
Beyries S., 1988, Traceology et Technologie: Aspects Methodologiques, P115