Medial lacrimal sac excision versus conventional H-shaped lacrimal sac opening in external dacryocystorhinostomy: a comparative cohort study

被引:1
作者
Roohe, S. L. [1 ]
Helsen, S. [1 ,2 ]
Paridaens, D. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rotterdam Eye Hosp, Dept Oculoplast & Orbital Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Oogklin Mon Hosp Deurne, Dept Oculoplast & Lacrimal Surg, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Erasmus MC, Orbital Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
ORBIT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS-OCULOPLASTIC AND LACRIMAL SURGERY | 2024年 / 43卷 / 01期
关键词
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction; NLDO; external dacryocystorhinostomy; DCR; lacrimal sac; INTUBATION; MUCOSAL; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1080/01676830.2023.2168017
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PurposeThe external dacryocystorhinostomy (Ex-DCR) is a reliable but surgically challenging procedure to overcome a nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). The aim of this study is to describe the outcomes of a modified technique of lacrimal sac opening and to compare it with the conventional Ex-DCR.MethodsThis comparative cohort study included adult patients undergoing Ex-DCR for primary acquired NLDO by or under supervision of one surgeon. Group 1 (conventional Ex-DCR including H-shaped incision, anastomosis of the anterior mucosal flap to nasal mucosal flap and resection of the posterior sac flap) was compared with Group 2 (modified Ex-DCR including excision of the medial lacrimal sac and anastomosis of remaining anterior sac flap to nasal mucosal flap). Outcome measures included the success rate (defined as complete symptom relief or patent irrigation after three months), reoperation rate, redo-free survival within five years, and occurrence of postoperative bleeding and postoperative infection.Results138 patients were included. The success rates were 94.7% (54/57 cases) for Group 1 and 96.3% (78/81) for Group 2 (p-value = 0.658). The redo-rate was 5.3% (3/75) in Group 1 and 2.5% (2/81) in Group 2 (p = 0.331). Two-year redo-free survival probability estimates were 89.8% for Group 1 and 96.3% for Group 2, respectively. No complications occurred in Group 2, whereas in Group 1, one patient (1.8%) suffered from postoperative bleeding and one (1.8%) from postoperative infection.ConclusionsThis study showed that our modified Ex-DCR technique is equally efficacious compared with the conventional Ex-DCR technique in adult patients with NLDO.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]   Comparison of treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Lin, Allen E. ;
Chang, Yu-Chieh ;
Lin, Meng-Ying ;
Tam, Ka-Wai ;
Shen, Yun-Dun .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2016, 51 (01) :34-40
[12]   Causes of dacryocystorhinostomy failure: External versus endoscopic approach [J].
Lin, Giant C. ;
Brook, Christopher D. ;
Hatton, Mark P. ;
Metson, Ralph .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2017, 31 (03) :181-185
[13]   Monocanalicular versus Bicanalicular Intubation in External Dacryocystorhinostomy for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction [J].
Saleh, George M. ;
Litwin, Andre S. ;
Samaras, Kostas ;
Tossounis, Charalambos M. ;
Gauba, Vinod ;
McLean, Chris J. .
ORBIT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS-OCULOPLASTIC AND LACRIMAL SURGERY, 2009, 28 (2-3) :110-114
[14]   Modified External Dacryocystorhinostomy in Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction [J].
Sharma, Hans Raj ;
Sharma, Ashok K. ;
Sharma, Rajni .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (10) :NC01-NC05
[15]   A Comparison of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy and External Dacryocystorhinostomy A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology [J].
Sobel, Rachel K. ;
Aakalu, Vinay K. ;
Wladis, Edward J. ;
Bilyk, Jurij R. ;
Yen, Michael T. ;
Mawn, Louise A. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 126 (11) :1580-1585
[16]  
Toti A., 1904, CLIN MOD PISA, V10, P385