Trajectories of physical and mental functioning over 25 years before onset of frailty: results from the Whitehall II cohort study

被引:6
作者
Landre, Benjamin [1 ]
Ben Hassen, Celine [1 ]
Kivimaki, Mika [1 ,2 ]
Bloomberg, Mikaela [2 ]
Dugravot, Aline [1 ]
Schniztler, Alexis [1 ]
Sabia, Severine [1 ,2 ]
Singh-Manoux, Archana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Cite, Epidemiol Ageing & Neurodegenerat Dis, CRESS, Inserm U1153, 10 Ave Verdun, F-75010 Paris, France
[2] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Frailty; Life course; Functioning; Epidemiology; OLD-AGE; FOLLOW-UP; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; LIFE; HEALTH; MIDLIFE; INEQUALITIES; DISABILITY; MORTALITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/jcsm.13129
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BackgroundResearch on frailty, a major contributor to heterogeneity in health, is undertaken on older adults although the processes leading to frailty are likely to begin earlier in the life course. Using repeat data spanning 25 years, we examined changes in physical and mental functioning before the onset of frailty, defined using Fried's frailty phenotype (FFP). MethodsFunctioning was measured using the Short-Form 36 General Health Survey (SF-36) on nine occasions from 1991 (age range 40-63 years) to 2015 (age range 63-85 years). The poorest of four FFP scores from 2002, 2007, 2012 and 2015 was used to classify participants as frail, pre-frail, or robust. We used linear mixed models with a backward timescale such that time 0 was the person-specific date of frailty classification for frail and pre-frail participants and the end of follow-up for robust participants. Analyses adjusted for socio-demographic factors, health behaviours, body mass index and multi-morbidity status were used to compare SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores over 25 years before time 0 as a function of FFP classification, with estimates extracted at time 0, -5, -10, -15, -20 and -25 years. We also used illness-death models to examine the prospective association between SF-36 component summary scores at age 50 and incident FFP-defined frailty. ResultsAmong 7044 participants of the Whitehall II cohort study included in the analysis [29% female, mean age 49.7 (SD = 6.0) at baseline in 1991], 2055 (29%) participants remained robust, and 4476 (64%) became pre-frail and 513 (7%) frail during follow-up. Frail compared with robust participants had lower SF-36 scores at t = -25 before onset of frailty with a difference of 3.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6, 5.1] in PCS and 1.8 (-0.2, 3.8) in MCS. At t = 0, the differences increased to 11.5 (10.5, 12.5) and 9.1 (8.0, 10.2), respectively. The differences in SF-36 between the robust and pre-frail groups, although smaller [at t = 0, 1.7 (1.2, 2.2) in PCS and 4.0 (3.4, 4.5) in MCS], were already observed 20 and 25 years, respectively, before the onset of pre-frailty. Prospective analyses showed that at age 50, scores in the bottom quartiles of PCS [hazard ratio (HR) compared with the top quartile = 2.39, 95% CI 1.85, 3.07] and MCS [HR = 1.49 (1.15, 1.93)] were associated with a higher risk of FFP-defined frailty at older ages. ConclusionsDifferences in trajectories of physical and mental functioning in individuals who developed physical frailty at older ages were observable 25 years before onset of FFP-defined frailty. These findings highlight the need for a life course approach in efforts to prevent frailty.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 297
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, WHO Clinical Consortium on Healthy Ageing Topic focus: frailty and intrinsic capacity [Internet]
  • [2] Apostolo Joao, 2018, JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep, V16, P140, DOI 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003382
  • [3] Validating a widely used measure of frailty: are all sub-components necessary? Evidence from the Whitehall II cohort study
    Bouillon, Kim
    Sabia, Severine
    Jokela, Markus
    Gale, Catharine R.
    Singh-Manoux, Archana
    Shipley, Martin J.
    Kivimaki, Mika
    Batty, G. David
    [J]. AGE, 2013, 35 (04) : 1457 - 1465
  • [4] Frailty, hospitalization, and progression of disability in a cohort of disabled older women
    Boyd, CM
    Xue, QL
    Simpson, CF
    Guralnik, JM
    Fried, LP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 118 (11) : 1225 - 1231
  • [5] The elephant in the room - healthy brains in later life, epidemiology and public health
    Brayne, Carol
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 8 (03) : 233 - 239
  • [6] VALIDATING THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NEW OUTCOME MEASURE FOR PRIMARY CARE
    BRAZIER, JE
    HARPER, R
    JONES, NMB
    OCATHAIN, A
    THOMAS, KJ
    USHERWOOD, T
    WESTLAKE, L
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846): : 160 - 164
  • [7] Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments
    Buta, Brian J.
    Walston, Jeremy D.
    Godino, Job G.
    Park, Minsun
    Kalyani, Rita R.
    Xue, Qian-Li
    Bandeen-Roche, Karen
    Varadhan, Ravi
    [J]. AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2016, 26 : 53 - 61
  • [8] Self-rated health trajectory and frailty among community-dwelling older adults: evidence from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA)
    Chu, Wei-Min
    Ho, Hsin-En
    Yeh, Chih-Jung
    Hsiao, Yu-Han
    Hsu, Pi-Shan
    Lee, Shu-Hsin
    Lee, Meng-Chih
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [9] Quality of life is substantially worse for community-dwelling older people living with frailty: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Crocker, Thomas F.
    Brown, Lesley
    Clegg, Andrew
    Farley, Katherine
    Franklin, Matthew
    Simpkins, Samantha
    Young, John
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (08) : 2041 - 2056
  • [10] Dent E., J NUTR HEALTH AGING, V23, P787