Real-time optimal protocol prediction of quantum key distribution using machine learning

被引:1
|
作者
Arthi, R. [1 ]
Nayana, J. S. [1 ]
Mondal, Rajarshee [1 ]
机构
[1] SRM Inst Sci & Techno, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Ramapuram Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Quantum key distribution; Machine learning; Optimal selector; Prediction;
D O I
10.1108/IJPCC-05-2022-0200
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of optimal protocol prediction and the benefits offered by quantum key distribution (QKD), including unbreakable security, there is a growing interest in the practical realization of quantum communication. Realization of the optimal protocol predictor in quantum key distribution is a critical step toward commercialization of QKD. Design/methodology/approach The proposed work designs a machine learning model such as K-nearest neighbor algorithm, convolutional neural networks, decision tree (DT), support vector machine and random forest (RF) for optimal protocol selector for quantum key distribution network (QKDN). Findings Because of the effectiveness of machine learning methods in predicting effective solutions using data, these models will be the best optimal protocol selectors for achieving high efficiency for QKDN. The results show that the best machine learning method for predicting optimal protocol in QKD is the RF algorithm. It also validates the effectiveness of machine learning in optimal protocol selection. Originality/value The proposed work was done using algorithms like the local search algorithm or exhaustive traversal, however the major downside of using these algorithms is that it takes a very long time to revert back results, which is unacceptable for commercial systems. Hence, machine learning methods are proposed to see the effectiveness of prediction for achieving high efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 697
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Real-Time Lithology Prediction at the Bit Using Machine Learning
    Burak, Tunc
    Sharma, Ashutosh
    Hoel, Espen
    Kristiansen, Tron Golder
    Welmer, Morten
    Nygaard, Runar
    GEOSCIENCES, 2024, 14 (10)
  • [2] Real-Time TCP Packet Loss Prediction Using Machine Learning
    Welzl, Michael
    Islam, Safiqul
    von Stephanides, Maximilian
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 159622 - 159634
  • [3] A Machine Learning Approach for Real-time Battery Optimal Operation Mode Prediction and Control
    Henri, Gonzague
    Lu, Ning
    Carrejo, Carlos
    2018 IEEE/PES TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION (T&D), 2018,
  • [4] Machine Learning for Real-Time Heart Disease Prediction
    Bertsimas, Dimitris
    Mingardi, Luca
    Stellato, Bartolomeo
    IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2021, 25 (09) : 3627 - 3637
  • [5] Machine learning for optimal parameter prediction in free space continuous-variable quantum key distribution
    Dong, Chen
    Cheng, Jin
    Liu, Ao
    Chen, Lanjian
    Chen, Yujie
    Yin, Peng
    Wu, Tianyi
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2025, 27 (04):
  • [6] Real-Time Weather Monitoring and Prediction Using City Buses and Machine Learning
    Huang, Zi-Qi
    Chen, Ying-Chih
    Wen, Chih-Yu
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (18) : 1 - 21
  • [7] Real-Time UAV Trajectory Prediction for UTM Surveillance Using Machine Learning
    Ruseno, Neno
    Lin, Chung-Yan
    UNMANNED SYSTEMS, 2024, 13 (02) : 505 - 519
  • [8] Real-Time Implementation of an Underwater Quantum Key Distribution System
    Kebapci, Burak
    Mutlu, Gorkem
    Baglica, Ibrahim
    Tosun, Anilcan
    Ergin, Sude
    Levent, Vecdi Emre
    Uysal, Murat
    Paglierani, Pietro
    Pelekanakis, Konstantinos
    Petroccia, Roberto
    Alves, Joao
    2022 SIXTH UNDERWATER COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE (UCOMMS), 2022,
  • [9] Real-time air quality prediction using traffic videos and machine learning
    Deveer, Laura
    Minet, Laura
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 142
  • [10] Real-Time Prediction for IC Aging Based on Machine Learning
    Huang, Ke
    Zhang, Xinqiao
    Karimi, Naghmeh
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2019, 68 (12) : 4756 - 4764