Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR: differences in prevalence and diagnostic criteria

被引:10
作者
Treml, Julia [1 ]
Linde, Katja [1 ]
Braehler, Elmar [2 ,3 ]
Kersting, Anette [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Med Fac, Dept Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Mainz, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Dept Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
prolonged grief disorder; ICD-11; DSM-5; bereavement; prevalence; COMPLEX BEREAVEMENT DISORDER; COMPLICATED GRIEF; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1266132
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) was recently included as a disorder in the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. Although both classification systems use the same name, the criteria content, and diagnostic approach vary. This study aimed to estimate the respective prevalence of PGDICD-11 and PGDDSM-5-TR and examine the diagnostic agreement while varying the diagnostic algorithm of PGDICD-11 (bereavement vs. symptom period; varying number of accessory symptoms).Methods A representative sample of the German general population (N = 2,509) was investigated, of which n=1,071 reported the loss of a close person. PGD symptoms were assessed with the Traumatic Grief Inventory - Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+).Results The point prevalence of PGD among the bereaved varied between 4.7%-6.8%, depending on the criteria and diagnostic algorithm. The prevalence of PGDDSM-5-TR was significantly lower than the prevalence of PGDICD-11. The diagnostic agreement between both criteria sets was substantial and increased after the number of accessory symptoms for PGDICD-11 was increased from one to three. The most common symptoms were intrusive thoughts/images related to the deceased person, longing for the deceased person, and difficulty accepting the loss.Conclusion The results demonstrate that the prevalence of PGD significantly varies depending on the application of the diagnostic algorithm and criteria. PGD affects a substantial proportion of the general population and should be addressed by healthcare providers. However, applying the minimum ICD-11 criteria could lead overestimating the prevalence. Therefore, further harmonizing the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR criteria and diagnostic algorithm for PGD seems appropriate.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2022, APA releases diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition. Text revision (DSM-5-TR), Vfifth
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, View and Comment on Recently Proposed Changes to DSM-5
[4]   Comparison of six proposed diagnostic criteria sets for disturbed grief [J].
Boelen, Paul A. ;
Lenferink, Lonneke I. M. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2020, 285
[5]   Further evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder and ICD-11 criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder [J].
Boelen, Paul A. ;
Lenferink, Lonneke I. M. ;
Smid, Geert E. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2019, 273 :206-210
[6]   Evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and validity of disturbed grief in DSM-5 and ICD-11 [J].
Boelen, Paul A. ;
Lenferink, Lonneke I. M. ;
Nickerson, Angela ;
Smid, Geert E. .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 240 :79-87
[7]   A prevalence assessment of prolonged grief disorder in Syrian refugees [J].
Bryant, Richard A. ;
Bawaneh, Ahmad ;
Giardinelli, Luana ;
Awwad, Manar ;
Al-Hayek, Hadeel ;
Akhtar, Aemal .
WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 20 (02) :302-303
[8]  
Desatatis, 2023, Was ist der Mikrozensus? Stat Bundesamt
[9]   Content overlap analyses of ICD-11 and DSM-5 prolonged grief disorder and prior criteria-sets [J].
Eisma, Maarten C. ;
Janshen, Antje ;
Lenferink, Lonneke I. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 13 (01)
[10]   ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder Criteria: Turning Challenges Into Opportunities With Multiverse Analyses [J].
Eisma, Maarten C. ;
Rosner, Rita ;
Comtesse, Hannah .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 11