The Effect of Practitioner Empathy on Patient Satisfaction A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

被引:15
作者
Keshtkar, Leila [1 ]
Madigan, Claire D. [2 ]
Ward, Andy [1 ]
Ahmed, Sarah [3 ]
Tanna, Vinay [3 ]
Rahman, Ismail [1 ]
Bostock, Jennifer [4 ]
Nockels, Keith [5 ]
Wang, Wen [6 ]
Gillies, Clare L. [7 ]
Howick, Jeremy [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Stoneygate Ctr Empath Healthcare, Leicester Med Sch, Leicester, England
[2] Loughborough Univ, Ctr Lifestyle Med & Behav CLiMB, Sch Sport Exercise & Hlth Sci, Loughborough, England
[3] Wythenshawe Hosp, Manchester Fdn Trust, Manchester, England
[4] London Sch Econ, London, England
[5] Univ Leicester, Lib & Learning Serv, Leicester, England
[6] Univ Leicester, Sch Business, Leicester, England
[7] Univ Leicester, Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Leicester, England
[8] Univ Leicester, George Davies Ctr, Leicester Med Sch, Stoneygate Centrefor Empath Healthcare, Lancaster Rd, Leicester LE1 7HA, England
关键词
RECEIVING BAD-NEWS; HEALTH-CARE; COMMUNICATION; IMPACT; EXPERIENCE; INTERVENTION; PHYSICIANS; SURGERY; QUALITY; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.7326/M23-2168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Practitioners who deliver enhanced empathy may improve patient satisfaction with care. Patient satisfaction is associated with positive patient outcomes ranging from medication adherence to survival. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of health care practitioner empathy on patient satisfaction, using a systematic review of randomized trials. Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus to 23 October 2023. Study Selection: Randomized trials published in any language that evaluated the effect of empathy on improving patient satisfaction as measured on a validated patient satisfaction scale. Data Extraction: Data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and strength-of-evidence assessments were done by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through consensus. Data Synthesis: Fourteen eligible randomized trials (80 practitioners; 1986 patients) were included in the analysis. Five studies had high risk of bias, and 9 had some concerns about bias. The trials were heterogeneous in terms of geographic locations (North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa), settings (hospital and primary care), practitioner types (family and hospital physicians, anesthesiologists, nurses, psychologists, and caregivers), and type of randomization (individual patient or clustered by practitioner). Although all trials suggested a positive change in patient satisfaction, inadequate reporting hindered the ability to draw definitive conclusions about the overall effect size. Limitations: Heterogeneity in the way that empathy was delivered and patient satisfaction was measured and incomplete reporting leading to concerns about the certainty of the underpinning evidence. Conclusion: Various empathy interventions have been studied to improve patient satisfaction. Development, testing, and reporting of high-quality studies within well-defined contexts is needed to optimize empathy interventions that increase patient satisfaction. Primary Funding Source: Stoneygate Trust. (PROSPERO: CRD42023412981)
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 209
页数:16
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Association of patient experience and the quality of hospital care [J].
Abdalla, Rawia ;
Pavlova, Milena ;
Groot, Wim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 35 (03)
[2]   What drives general practitioners in the UK to improve the quality of care? A systematic literature review [J].
Ahmed, Kanwal ;
Hashim, Salma ;
Khankhara, Mariyam ;
Said, Ilhan ;
Shandakumar, Amrita Tara ;
Zaman, Sadia ;
Veiga, Andre .
BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2021, 10 (01)
[3]  
Aihua Z., 2017, CHINESE NURSING RES, V31, P3820
[4]  
Akafa T A, 2021, West Afr J Med, VVol. 38, P1004
[5]  
Anandaciva S., 2023, King's Fund, P1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GRADEPRO GUID DEV TO
[7]  
Aronson J, 2016, BMJ Blogs
[8]  
Baker R, 1992, Qual Health Care, V1, P104, DOI 10.1136/qshc.1.2.104
[9]   Improving patient satisfaction through physician education, feedback, and incentives [J].
Banka, Gaurav ;
Edgington, Sarah ;
Kyulo, Namgyal ;
Padilla, Tony ;
Mosley, Virgie ;
Afsarmanesh, Nasim ;
Fonarow, Gregg C. ;
Ong, Michael K. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2015, 10 (08) :497-502
[10]   A literature review to explore the link between treatment satisfaction and adherence, compliance, and persistence [J].
Barbosa, Carla Dias ;
Balp, Maria-Magdalena ;
Kulich, Karoly ;
Germain, Nicola ;
Rofail, Diana .
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2012, 6 :39-48