Lateral Subvastus Lateralis versus Medial Parapatellar Approach for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Outcomes and Kinematics Analysis

被引:0
作者
Sidhu, Sahil P. [1 ]
Broberg, Jordan S. [1 ]
Willing, Ryan [1 ]
Teeter, Matthew G. [1 ]
Lanting, Brent A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 339 Windermere Rd, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
关键词
arthroplasty; knee; approach; kinematics; MEASURED RESECTION TECHNIQUES; CONTACT KINEMATICS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1055/s-0043-1777077
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The conventional approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a medial parapatellar approach (MPA). We aimed to study patient outcomes and kinematics with a quadriceps sparing lateral subvastus lateralis approach (SLA). Patients with neutral/varus alignment undergoing primary TKA were consented to undergo the SLA. At 1-year postoperative, patients underwent radiostereometric analysis. Patients were administered the Short Form 12 (SF-12), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Society Score (KSS). Kinematics and outcome data were compared to a group undergoing TKA via conventional MPA. Fourteen patients underwent TKA via SLA with a mean age 71.5 +/- 8.0 and mean body mass index (BMI) 31.0 +/- 4.5. The MPA group had 13 patients with mean age 63.4 +/- 5.5 (p = 0.006) and mean BMI 31.2 +/- 4.6 (p = 0.95). The SLA resulted in a significantly more posterior medial contact point at 0 (p = 0.011), 20 (p = 0.020), and 40 (p = 0.039) degrees of flexion. There was no significant difference in medial contact point from 60 to 120 degrees, lateral contact point at any degree of flexion, or axial rotation. There was no difference in improvement in postoperative WOMAC, SF-12, KSS function, and total KSS knee scores between groups. The MPA group had a significantly greater improvement in KSS knee scores at 3 months (p < 0.001), 1 year (p = 0.003), and 2 years (p = 0.017). The SLA resulted in increased medial femoral rollback early in flexion. Although both approaches resulted in improved postoperative outcomes, the MPA group showed significantly greater improvements in KSS knee scores at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Further studies are required to identify any benefits that the SLA may offer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 529
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics
    Angerame, Marc R.
    Holst, David C.
    Jennings, Jason M.
    Komistek, Richard D.
    Dennis, Douglas A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (10) : 2502 - 2510
  • [2] Predictive Models for Clinical Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Analysis
    Batailler, Cecile
    Lording, Timothy
    De Massari, Daniele
    Witvoet-Braam, Sietske
    Bini, Stefano
    Lustig, Sebastien
    [J]. ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 9 : 1 - 15
  • [3] Bellamy N, 2005, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V23, pS148
  • [4] Age and Preoperative Knee Society Score Are Significant Predictors of Outcomes Among Asians Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Bin Abd Razak, Hamid Rahmatullah
    Tan, Chuen-Seng
    Chen, Yongqiang Jerry Delphi
    Pang, Hee-Nee
    Tay, Keng-Jin Darren
    Chin, Pak-Lin
    Chia, Shi-Lu
    Lo, Ngai-Nung
    Yeo, Seng-Jin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (09) : 735 - 741
  • [5] Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not?
    Bourne, Robert B.
    Chesworth, Bert M.
    Davis, Aileen M.
    Mahomed, Nizar N.
    Charron, Kory D. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [6] Contact kinematics of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty
    Broberg, Jordan S.
    Naudie, Douglas D. R.
    Howard, James L.
    Vasarhelyi, Edward M.
    McCalden, Richard W.
    Teeter, Matthew G.
    [J]. KNEE, 2020, 27 (05) : 1501 - 1509
  • [7] Comparison of Contact Kinematics in Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty at Long-Term Follow-Up
    Broberg, Jordan S.
    Ndoja, Silvio
    MacDonald, Steven J.
    Lanting, Brent A.
    Teeter, Matthew G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (01) : 272 - 277
  • [8] Normal Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Knee
    Flandry, Fred
    Hommel, Gabriel
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2011, 19 (02) : 82 - 92
  • [9] The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint
    Freeman, MAR
    Pinskerova, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 38 (02) : 197 - 208
  • [10] Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA Project
    Gandek, B
    Ware, JE
    Aaronson, NK
    Apolone, G
    Bjorner, JB
    Brazier, JE
    Bullinger, M
    Kaasa, S
    Leplege, A
    Prieto, L
    Sullivan, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) : 1171 - 1178