Do farmers' risk preferences remain stable in the face of climatic shocks? Evidence from smallholder farmers in Zambia

被引:7
作者
Mulungu, Kelvin [1 ]
Kimani, Mumbi E. [2 ]
Sarr, Mare [3 ]
机构
[1] Int Ctr Insect Physiol & Ecol icipe, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Penn State Univ, Sch Int Affairs, Sch Econ & Finance, Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Penn State Univ, Sch Int Affairs & Alliance Educ Sci Engn & Design, Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
Risk preferences; climatic shocks; smallholder farmers; Zambia; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION; DECISION-MAKING; WEATHER SHOCKS; COTTON FARMERS; ADAPTATION; VARIABILITY; BEHAVIOR; IMPACTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2023.2177599
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Smallholder farmers in Africa are vulnerable to changing climatic conditions because of their dependence on rainfed agriculture. Their adaptation strategies, which are critical for food security, are oftentimes influenced by their risk-taking attitude. This study examines whether experiencing climatic shocks (defined here as drought events) shapes farmers' risk aversion. The study addresses two crucial questions: 1) how do drought events alter risk preferences among smallholder farmers; and 2) how long does the impact last? Using a panel survey from Zambia and high spatial resolution climate data, we infer the average Arrow-Pratt and downside risk aversion coefficients from the moment of the distribution of crop production. We find that, on average, the sampled farmers are risk averse. Furthermore, farmers who experienced a drought in the previous year become more risk averse, while farmers who experienced recurring droughts within the previous three years become even more risk averse. These results have implications on adaptation to climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:1784 / 1800
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Rainfall shocks and agricultural productivity: Implication for rural household consumption [J].
Amare, Mulubrhan ;
Jensen, Nathaniel D. ;
Shiferaw, Bekele ;
Cisse, Jennifer Denno .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 166 :79-89
[2]   Planned Versus Actual Betting in Sequential Gambles [J].
Andrade, Eduardo B. ;
Iyer, Ganesh .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2009, 46 (03) :372-383
[3]  
Antle J.M., 1983, Journal of Business Economic Statistics, V1, P192, DOI DOI 10.1080/07350015.1983.10509339
[4]   ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION OF PRODUCERS RISK ATTITUDES [J].
ANTLE, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1987, 69 (03) :509-522
[5]   Climate Smart Agriculture? Assessing the Adaptation Implications in Zambia [J].
Arslan, Aslihan ;
McCarthy, Nancy ;
Lipper, Leslie ;
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Cattaneo, Andrea ;
Kokwe, Misael .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 66 (03) :753-780
[6]   Agricultural Technology Adoption under Climate Change in the Sahel: Micro-evidence from Niger [J].
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Di Battista, Federica ;
Lipper, Leslie .
JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2016, 25 (05) :637-669
[7]   Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia [J].
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Shiferaw, Bekele ;
Simtowe, Franklin ;
Lipper, Leslie .
FOOD POLICY, 2012, 37 (03) :283-295
[8]   Risk Preferences and Environmental Uncertainty: Implications for Crop Diversification Decisions in Ethiopia [J].
Bezabih, Mintewab ;
Sarr, Mare .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (04) :483-505
[9]   Stability of risk attitude, agricultural policies and production shocks: evidence from Italy [J].
Bozzola, Martina ;
Finger, Robert .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 48 (03) :477-501
[10]   The welfare effects of crop biodiversity as an adaptation to climate shocks in Kenya [J].
Bozzola, Martina ;
Smale, Melinda .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 135