Phylogenetic Diversity Rankings in the Face of Extinctions: The Robustness of the Fair Proportion Index

被引:2
作者
Fischer, Mareike [1 ]
Francis, Andrew [2 ]
Wicke, Kristina [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greifswald, Inst Math & Comp Sci, Walther Rathenau Str 47, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Comp Data & Math Sci, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Math, 231 W 18th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Biodiversity conservation; Fair Proportion index; phylogenetic diversity; species prioritization; SHAPLEY VALUE;
D O I
10.1093/sysbio/syac030
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Planning for the protection of species often involves difficult choices about which species to prioritize, given constrained resources. One way of prioritizing species is to consider their "evolutionary distinctiveness," (ED) that is, their relative evolutionary isolation on a phylogenetic tree. Several evolutionary isolation metrics or phylogenetic diversity indices have been introduced in the literature, among them the so-called Fair Proportion (FP) index (also known as the ED score). This index apportions the total diversity of a tree among all leaves, thereby providing a simple prioritization criterion for conservation. Here, we focus on the prioritization order obtained from the FP index and analyze the effects of species extinction on this ranking. More precisely, we analyze the extent to which the ranking order may change when some species go extinct and the FP index is recomputed for the remaining taxa. We show that for each phylogenetic tree, there are edge lengths such that the extinction of one leaf per cherry completely reverses the ranking. Moreover, we show that even if only the lowest-ranked species goes extinct, the ranking order may drastically change. We end by analyzing the effects of these two extinction scenarios (extinction of the lowest-ranked species and extinction of one leaf per cherry) for a collection of empirical and simulated trees. In both cases, we can observe significant changes in the prioritization orders, highlighting the empirical relevance of our theoretical findings.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 615
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, CMS CONVENTION CONSE
  • [2] CONSERVATION EVALUATION AND PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY
    FAITH, DP
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1992, 61 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [3] Equality of Shapley value and fair proportion index in phylogenetic trees
    Fuchs, Michael
    Jin, Emma Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 71 (05) : 1133 - 1147
  • [4] The Shapley value of phylogenetic trees
    Haake, Claus-Jochen
    Kashiwada, Akemi
    Su, Francis Edward
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 56 (04) : 479 - 497
  • [5] HARDING E. F., 1971, ADV APPL PROBAB, V3, P44, DOI DOI 10.2307/1426329
  • [6] Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation Priorities Based on Threat and Phylogeny
    Isaac, Nick J. B.
    Turvey, Samuel T.
    Collen, Ben
    Waterman, Carly
    Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2007, 2 (03):
  • [7] Measuring tree balance using symmetry nodes - A new balance index and its extremal properties
    Kersting, Sophie J.
    Fischer, Mareike
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2021, 341
  • [8] TimeTree: A Resource for Timelines, Timetrees, and Divergence Times
    Kumar, Sudhir
    Stecher, Glen
    Suleski, Michael
    Hedges, S. Blair
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 34 (07) : 1812 - 1819
  • [9] Distributions of cherries for two models of trees
    McKenzie, A
    Steel, M
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2000, 164 (01) : 81 - 92
  • [10] Piel William H., 2002, Research Report from the National Institute for Environmental Studies Japan, V171, P41