Post-operative evaluation of computed tomography imaging following cochlear implantation

被引:0
作者
Kaul, Vivian F. [1 ,7 ]
Brannan, Zachary [2 ]
Keith, Jason [3 ]
Hittle, Bradley [2 ]
Riggs, William [1 ]
Hiss, Meghan [1 ]
Varadarajan, Varun [4 ]
Zhan, Kevin [5 ]
Powell, Kimerly [1 ]
Wiet, Gregory J. [1 ,6 ]
Adunka, Oliver F. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, 915 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH 43212 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Engn, 2070 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Associates Otolaryngol Colorado, 850 E Harvard Ave 505, Denver, CO 80210 USA
[5] Northwestern Med Grp, 251 East Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, 700 Childrens Dr, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
[7] 6431 Fannin St MSB 5-036, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Cochlear implant; Electrode; Translocation; Computed tomography; INSERTION DEPTH; AUDIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; PERIMODIOLAR; PERFORMANCE; LOCATION; HEARING; TRAUMA; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104081
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study utilized an automated segmentation algorithm to assess the cochlear implant electrode array within the cochlea and investigate its impact on audiologic outcomes as measured by post-operative speech perception scores. Furthermore, manual evaluations of electrode placement were compared to automatic segmentation methods to determine their accuracy in predicting post-operative audiologic outcomes.Materials and methods: This retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary care referral center involving adult post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients implanted from 2015 to 2019. Patients with appropriate postoperative imaging and speech testing were included. Patients were excluded if non-English speaking, had a cognitive deficit, or a labyrinthine malformation. Automated and manual methods were used to analyze computed tomography (CT) scans and correlate the findings with post-operative speech perception scores and detection of electrode translocation.Results: Among the 47 patients who met inclusion criteria, 15 had electrode translocations confirmed by automatic segmentation methods. Controlling for CI usage and pre-operative AzBio scores, patients with translocation exhibited significantly lower consonant-nucleus consonant (CNC) and AzBio scores at 6-months post-implantation compared to patients with ST insertions. Moreover, the number of translocated electrode contacts was significantly associated with post-operative CNC scores. Manual evaluations of electrode location were predictive but less sensitive to electrode translocations when compared with automated 3D segmentation. Conclusions: Placement of CI electrode contacts within ST without translocation into SV, leads to improved audiologic outcomes. Manual assessment of electrode placement via temporal bone CT, without 3D reconstruction, provides a less sensitive method to determine electrode placement than automated methods. Level of evidence: Level 4. Lay summary: This study investigated the impact of electrode placement on speech outcomes for cochlear implant recipients. Using advanced imaging techniques, the researchers compared automated and manual methods for evaluating electrode position and examined the relationship between electrode translocation and audiologic outcomes. The findings revealed that proper placement within the cochlea without translocation into inappropriate compartments inside the cochlea improves speech understanding. Manual evaluations were somewhat accurate but less sensitive in detecting translocations compared to automated methods, which offer more precise predictions of patient outcomes. These results contribute to our understanding of factors influencing cochlear implant success and highlight the importance of optimizing electrode placement for improved speech outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli
    Adunka, O
    Kiefer, J
    Unkelbach, MH
    Radeloff, A
    Gstoettner, W
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2005, 30 (02): : 121 - 127
  • [2] Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma
    Adunka, Oliver
    Kiefer, Jan
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2006, 135 (03) : 374 - 382
  • [3] Automated Calculation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Parameters in Clinical Cone-Beam CT
    Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts
    Keith, Jason P.
    Hittle, Brad
    Riggs, William J.
    Adunka, Oliver
    Wiet, Gregory J.
    Powell, Kimerly A.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [4] Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults
    Aschendorff, Antje
    Kromeier, Jan
    Klenzner, Thomas
    Laszig, Roland
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2007, 28 (02) : 75S - 79S
  • [5] Blamey P, 1996, Audiol Neurootol, V1, P293
  • [6] Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients
    Blamey, Peter
    Artieres, Franoise
    Baskent, Deniz
    Bergeron, Francois
    Beynon, Andy
    Burke, Elaine
    Dillier, Norbert
    Dowell, Richard
    Fraysse, Bernard
    Gallego, Stephane
    Govaerts, Paul J.
    Green, Kevin
    Huber, Alexander M.
    Kleine-Punte, Andrea
    Maat, Bert
    Marx, Mathieu
    Mawman, Deborah
    Mosnier, Isabelle
    O'Connor, Alec Fitzgerald
    O'Leary, Stephen
    Rousset, Alexandra
    Schauwers, Karen
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    Skarzynski, Piotr H.
    Sterkers, Olivier
    Terranti, Assia
    Truy, Eric
    Van de Heyning, Paul
    Venail, Frederic
    Vincent, Christophe
    Lazard, Diane S.
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2013, 18 (01) : 36 - 47
  • [7] Buchman CA, 2014, OTOL NEUROTOL, V35, P1773, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000541
  • [8] Implications of Minimizing Trauma During Conventional Cochlear Implantation
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    Gifford, Rene H.
    Service, Geoffrey J.
    Tombers, Nicole M.
    Hughes-Borst, Becky J.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Beatty, Charles W.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2011, 32 (06) : 962 - 968
  • [9] Doshi Jayesh, 2015, Cochlear Implants Int, V16 Suppl 1, pS33, DOI 10.1179/1467010014Z.000000000231
  • [10] 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Beichel, Reinhard
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Finet, Julien
    Fillion-Robin, Jean-Christophe
    Pujol, Sonia
    Bauer, Christian
    Jennings, Dominique
    Fennessy, Fiona
    Sonka, Milan
    Buatti, John
    Aylward, Stephen
    Miller, James V.
    Pieper, Steve
    Kikinis, Ron
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 30 (09) : 1323 - 1341