?How can we?? the need to direct research in digital agriculture towards capacities

被引:10
作者
Ingram, Julie [1 ]
Maye, Damian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gloucestershire, Countryside & Community Res Inst CCRI, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, Glocs, England
关键词
Digital agriculture; Directionalities; Farming; Organisational capacity; Human capacity; BIG DATA; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; DECISION; POLICY; OPPORTUNITIES; TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION; PRODUCERS; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.03.011
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Concerns about digital agriculture reinforcing industrialised models of agriculture and power inequalities have been widely articulated. This paper uses directionalities, which are characterised by dominant and durable di-rections or pathways, to conceptualise this envisaged entrenchment. It argues that we need to anticipate and collect the evidence on which to govern digital agriculture technologies before such directionalities set in. To support this anticipatory need, the paper draws on findings from a research prioritisation exercise with stake-holders in the UK. It identifies and critically analyses two interconnecting meta-themes, organisational capacity and human capacity, which emerged inductively in the analysis of selected themes and priority research ques-tions. In doing this, the paper widens the scope of enquiry about digital agriculture, by introducing 'capacities' as a new theoretical lens to examine how institutional structures and processes shape the utilisation of digital data, technologies and their underlying directionalities. The paper concludes by outlining the implications of this new perspective on directionalities and capacities for digital agriculture research in the UK and internationally.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 109 条
  • [1] Adger W.N., 2003, SOCIAL ASPECTS ADAPT
  • [2] Real-time politics: The Internet and the political process
    Agre, PE
    [J]. INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2002, 18 (05) : 311 - 331
  • [3] Is the trend your friend? An analysis of technology 4.0 investment decisions in agricultural SMEs
    Annosi, Maria Carmela
    Brunetta, Federica
    Monti, Alberto
    Nati, Francesco
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2019, 109 : 59 - 71
  • [4] Arnaldi S., 2016, RRI GOVERNANCE PARAD
  • [5] COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS
    ARTHUR, WB
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) : 116 - 131
  • [6] IT as enabler of sustainable farming: An empirical analysis of farmers' adoption decision of precision agriculture technology
    Aubert, Benoit A.
    Schroeder, Andreas
    Grimaudo, Jonathan
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2012, 54 (01) : 510 - 520
  • [7] Supporting and practising digital innovation with advisers in smart farming
    Ayre, Margaret
    Mc Collum, Vivienne
    Waters, Warwick
    Samson, Peter
    Curro, Anthony
    Nettle, Ruth
    Paschen, Jana-Axinja
    King, Barbara
    Reichelt, Nicole
    [J]. NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2019, 90-91
  • [8] Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A cross regional study of EU farmers
    Barnes, A. P.
    Soto, I.
    Eory, V.
    Beck, B.
    Balafoutis, A.
    Sanchez, B.
    Vangeyte, J.
    Fountas, S.
    van der Wal, T.
    Gomez-Barbero, M.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 80 : 163 - 174
  • [9] Perceptions of the Fourth Agricultural Revolution: What's In, What's Out, and What Consequences are Anticipated?
    Barrett, Hannah
    Rose, David Christian
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2022, 62 (02) : 162 - 189
  • [10] Boughzala I., 2020, P ANN HAW INT C SYST