Factors associated with online examination cheating

被引:18
|
作者
Henderson, Michael [1 ]
Chung, Jennifer [2 ]
Awdry, Rebecca [1 ]
Mundy, Matthew [1 ]
Bryant, Mike [1 ]
Ashford, Cliff [1 ]
Ryan, Kris [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Online examinations; assessment security; academic integrity; cheating; ACADEMIC DISHONESTY; EXAMS; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2022.2144802
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Online examinations are a common experience in higher education. Their security is a key concern for education communities, and has resulted in a variety of cheating countermeasures. There is broad consensus in the literature that there is no one measure, including proctoring, which eradicates cheating behaviours. As a result, this study is exploratory, seeking to add to our understanding of the range of factors that may interact with frequency of cheating behaviour in online examinations. This large-scale study (N = 7839) is based in one Australian university which pivoted to online examinations during the 2021 Covid-19 lockdowns. Students who reported cheating (n = 216) revealed a wide range of factors that may have influenced their behaviours. A key observation is that cheating, although less frequent than reported elsewhere, occurred regardless of the security measure, assessment design, examination condition, and across the spectrum of student demographic variables. However, there were statistically significant differences in relation to frequency of cheating according to certain demographics, examination conditions, motivations, attitudes and perceptions. Although some forms of proctoring did demonstrate reduced frequencies in self-reported cheating, they are demonstrably incomplete solutions due to the complexity of other variables.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 994
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Examination cheating: Risks to the quality and integrity of higher education
    Baijnath, Narend
    Singh, Divya
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2019, 115 (11-12)
  • [32] Analysis and Prevention Measures for Examination Cheating in Higher Education
    Qiang, Xie
    INFORMATION AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, PT I, 2012, 267 : 301 - 306
  • [33] Examination cheating attitudes and intentions of students in a Ghanaian polytechnic
    Mensah, Christopher
    Azila-Gbettor, Edem Maxwell
    Appietu, Melody Enyonam
    JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN TRAVEL & TOURISM, 2016, 16 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [34] PERFORMANCE AND CHEATING IN ONLINE EXAMS: A STUDENT'S PERSPECTIVE
    Frei, Georgina V.
    NASLEDE, 2022, 19 (53): : 129 - 150
  • [35] A Study of Cheating Identification and Measurement of the Effect in Online Game
    Ahn, Daehwan
    Yoo, Byungjoon
    AMCIS 2017 PROCEEDINGS, 2017,
  • [36] Cheating at online formative tests: Does it pay off?
    Arnold, Ivo J. M.
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 29 : 98 - 106
  • [37] The effect of loss aversion and entitlement on cheating: An online experiment
    Ortiz, Jose M.
    Zindel, Marcia
    Da Silva, Sergio
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2023, 233
  • [38] Cheating Detection in Online Assessments via Timeline Analysis
    Du, Jiameng
    Song, Yifan
    An, Mingxiao
    An, Marshall
    Bogart, Christopher
    Sakr, Majd
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 53RD ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE 2022), VOL 1, 2022, : 98 - 104
  • [39] Detecting probable cheating during online assessments based on time delay and head pose
    Chuang, Chia Yuan
    Craig, Scotty D.
    Femiani, John
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 36 (06) : 1123 - 1137
  • [40] A social-cognitive approach to online game cheating
    Wu, Yuehua
    Chen, Vivian Hsueh Hua
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 29 (06) : 2557 - 2567