Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters

被引:31
|
作者
Teja, Bijan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bosch, Nicholas A. [5 ]
Diep, Calvin [3 ]
Pereira, Tiago V. [6 ,7 ]
Mauricio, Paolo [5 ,8 ]
Sklar, Michael C. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sankar, Ashwin [3 ,4 ]
Wijeysundera, Harindra C. [9 ]
Saskin, Refik [10 ]
Walkey, Allan [11 ]
Wijeysundera, Duminda N. [3 ,4 ,10 ,12 ]
Wunsch, Hannah [3 ,13 ,14 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, 30 Bond St,Rm 6-504, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Interdept Div Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Boston Univ, Pulm Ctr, Chobanian & Avedisian Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Clin Trial Unit, Oxford, England
[7] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Epidemiol Studies Unit, Oxford, England
[8] Boston Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Chobanian & Avedisian Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[9] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Schulich Heart Program, Div Cardiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Univ Toronto, ICES Cent, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Univ Massachusetts, Chan Med Sch, Div Hlth Syst Sci, Worcester, MA USA
[12] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Appl Hlth Res Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[13] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY USA
[14] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8232
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used but are associated with complications. Quantifying complication rates is essential for guiding CVC utilization decisions. Objective To summarize current rates of CVC-associated complications. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases were searched for observational studies and randomized clinical trials published between 2015 to 2023. Study Selection This study included English-language observational studies and randomized clinical trials of adult patients that reported complication rates of short-term centrally inserted CVCs and data for 1 or more outcomes of interest. Studies that evaluated long-term intravascular devices, focused on dialysis catheters not typically used for medication administration, or studied catheters placed by radiologists were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis was applied to summarize event rates. Rates of placement complications (events/1000 catheters with 95% credible interval [CrI]) and use complications (events/1000 catheter-days with 95% CrI) were estimated. Main Outcomes and Measures Ten prespecified complications associated with CVC placement (placement failure, arterial puncture, arterial cannulation, pneumothorax, bleeding events requiring action, nerve injury, arteriovenous fistula, cardiac tamponade, arrhythmia, and delay of >= 1 hour in vasopressor administration) and 5 prespecified complications associated with CVC use (malfunction, infection, deep vein thrombosis [DVT], thrombophlebitis, and venous stenosis) were assessed. The composite of 4 serious complications (arterial cannulation, pneumothorax, infection, or DVT) after CVC exposure for 3 days was also assessed. Results Of 11 722 screened studies, 130 were included in the analyses. Seven of 15 prespecified complications were meta-analyzed. Placement failure occurred at 20.4 (95% CrI, 10.9-34.4) events per 1000 catheters placed. Other rates of CVC placement complications (per 1000 catheters) were arterial canulation (2.8; 95% CrI, 0.1-10), arterial puncture (16.2; 95% CrI, 11.5-22), and pneumothorax (4.4; 95% CrI, 2.7-6.5). Rates of CVC use complications (per 1000 catheter-days) were malfunction (5.5; 95% CrI, 0.6-38), infection (4.8; 95% CrI, 3.4-6.6), and DVT (2.7; 95% CrI, 1.0-6.2). It was estimated that 30.2 (95% CrI, 21.8-43.0) in 1000 patients with a CVC for 3 days would develop 1 or more serious complication (arterial cannulation, pneumothorax, infection, or DVT). Use of ultrasonography was associated with lower rates of arterial puncture (risk ratio [RR], 0.20; 95% CrI, 0.09-0.44; 13.5 events vs 68.8 events/1000 catheters) and pneumothorax (RR, 0.25; 95% CrI, 0.08-0.80; 2.4 events vs 9.9 events/1000 catheters). Conclusions and Relevance Approximately 3% of CVC placements were associated with major complications. Use of ultrasonography guidance may reduce specific risks including arterial puncture and pneumothorax.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 482
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Mechanical complications of central venous catheters in children: A cohort study
    Moore, Kieran J.
    Greencorn, David
    Smith, Nadine
    Langley, Joanne M.
    Kulkarni, Ketan
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 43 (11) : 1634 - 1640
  • [12] Hospital-wide survey of the use of central venous catheters
    Zingg, W.
    Sandoz, L.
    Inan, C.
    Cartier, V.
    Clergue, F.
    Pittet, D.
    Walder, B.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2011, 77 (04) : 304 - 308
  • [13] Clinical practices concerning central venous catheters in haematological patients
    Boersma, R. S.
    Schouten, H. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2010, 14 (03) : 200 - 204
  • [14] Femoral central venous catheters are not associated with higher rates of infection in the pediatric critical care population
    Reyes, Joel A.
    Habash, Michelle L.
    Taylor, Richard P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2012, 40 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [15] Central venous catheters: incidence and predictive factors of venous thrombosis
    Hammes, Mary
    Desai, Amishi
    Pasupneti, Shravani
    Kress, John
    Funaki, Brian
    Watson, Sydeaka
    Herlitz, Jean
    Hines, Jane
    CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 84 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [16] Infectious risk associated with arterial catheters compared with central venous catheters
    Lucet, Jean-Christophe
    Bouadma, Lila
    Zahar, Jean-Ralph
    Schwebel, Carole
    Geffroy, Arnaud
    Pease, Sebastian
    Herault, Marie-Christine
    Haouache, Hakim
    Adrie, Christophe
    Thuong, Marie
    Francais, Adrien
    Garrouste-Orgeas, Maite
    Timsit, Jean-Francois
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04) : 1030 - 1035
  • [17] Central venous catheters: Follow the evidence, not the guidelines
    Lipshutz, Angela K. M.
    Gropper, Michael A.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (08) : 2528 - 2529
  • [18] Anticoagulation for people with cancer and central venous catheters
    Kahale, Lara A.
    Tsolakian, Ibrahim G.
    Hakoum, Maram B.
    Matar, Charbel F.
    Barba, Maddalena
    Yosuico, Victor E. D.
    Terrenato, Irene
    Sperati, Francesca
    Schunemann, Holger
    Akl, Elie A.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (06):
  • [19] Central venous catheters: Which, when and how
    Kehagias, Elias
    Galanakis, Nikolaos
    Tsetis, Dimitrios
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 96 (1151)
  • [20] Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies
    Patel, G. S.
    Jain, K.
    Kumar, R.
    Strickland, A. H.
    Pellegrini, L.
    Slavotinek, J.
    Eaton, M.
    McLeay, W.
    Price, T.
    Ly, M.
    Ullah, S.
    Koczwara, B.
    Kichenadasse, G.
    Karapetis, C. S.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (01) : 121 - 128