From Driver to Supervisor: Comparing Cognitive Load and EEG-Based Attentional Resource Allocation Across Automation Levels

被引:9
作者
Figalova, Nikol [1 ]
Bieg, Hans-Joachim [2 ]
Reiser, Julian Elias [3 ]
Liu, Yuan-Cheng [4 ]
Baumann, Martin [5 ]
Chuang, Lewis [6 ]
Pollatos, Olga [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Inst Psychol & Educ, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Albert Einstein Allee 45, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] Robert Bosch GmbH, Corp Res, Robert Bosch Campus 1, D-71272 Renningen, Germany
[3] Leibniz Res Ctr Working Environm & Human Factors, Ergon Dept, Ardeystr 67, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany
[4] Sch Engn & Design, Chair Ergon, Dept Mech Engn, Boltzmannstr 15, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[5] Ulm Univ, Inst Psychol & Educ, Dept Human Factors, Albert Einstein Allee 45, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[6] Tech Univ Chemnitz, Inst Media Res, Fac Humanities, Dept Human & Technol, D-09107 Chemnitz, Germany
关键词
Automated driving; Attention; Attentional resource allocation; Cognitive load; P3a; Passive oddball task; Event-related potentials; ACOUSTIC NOVELTY; MENTAL WORKLOAD; PERFORMANCE; MECHANISMS; TAXONOMY; BEHAVIOR; P3A;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103169
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With increasing automation, drivers' roles transition from active operators to passive system supervisors, affecting their behaviour and cognitive processes. This study addresses the attentional resource allocation and subjective cognitive load during manual, SAE Level 2, and SAE Level 3 driving in a realistic environment. An experiment was conducted on a test track with 30 participants using a prototype automated vehicle. While driving, participants were subjected to a passive auditory oddball task and their electroencephalogram was recorded. The study analysed the amplitude of the P3a event-related potential component elicited novel environmental stimuli, an objective measure of attentional resource allocation. The subjective cognitive load was assessed using the NASA Task Load Index. Results showed no significant difference in subjective cognitive load between manual and Level 2 driving, but a decrease in subjective cognitive load in Level 3 driving. The P3a amplitude was highest during manual driving, indicating increased attentional resource allocation to environmental sounds compared to Level 2 and Level 3 driving. This may suggest that during automated driving, drivers allocate fewer attentional resources to processing environmental information. remains unclear whether the decreased processing of environmental stimuli in automated driving is due top-down attention control (leading to attention withdrawal) or bottom-up competition for resources induced by cognitive load. This study provides novel empirical evidence on resource allocation and subjective cognitive load in automated driving. The findings highlight the importance of managing drivers' attention and cognitive load with implications for enhancing automation safety and the design of user interfaces.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [81] Stapel Jork, 2017, P RSS2017 C
  • [82] The Effect of Cognitive Load on Auditory Susceptibility During Automated Driving
    Van der Heiden, Remo M. A.
    Kenemans, J. Leon
    Donker, Stella F.
    Janssen, Christian P.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 64 (07) : 1195 - 1209
  • [83] Susceptibility to audio signals during autonomous driving
    van der Heiden, Remo M. A.
    Janssen, Christian P.
    Donker, Stella F.
    Hardeman, Lotte E. S.
    Mans, Keri
    Kenemans, J. Leon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (08):
  • [84] Driving with and without automation on the motorway - an observational study
    Varhelyi, Andras
    Kaufmann, Clemens
    Johnsson, Carl
    Almqvist, Sverker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 25 (06) : 587 - 608
  • [85] Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving
    Vogelpohl, Tobias
    Kuehn, Matthias
    Hummel, Thomas
    Vollrath, Mark
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2019, 126 : 70 - 84
  • [86] Salience Determines Attentional Orienting in Visual Selection
    Wang, Benchi
    Theeuwes, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2020, 46 (10) : 1051 - 1057
  • [87] Event-related potentials and secondary task. performance during simulated driving
    Wester, A. E.
    Bockner, K. B. E.
    Volkerts, E. R.
    Verster, J. C.
    Kenemans, J. L.
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2008, 40 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [88] Systematic review of driving simulator validation studies
    Wynne, Rachael A.
    Beanland, Vanessa
    Salmon, Paul M.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 117 : 138 - 151
  • [89] Driver behaviour validity in driving simulators - Analysis of the moment of initiation of braking at urban intersections
    Zoeller, Ilka
    Abendroth, Bettina
    Bruder, Ralph
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 61 : 120 - 130