Mucosal Microbiome in Patients with Early Bowel Polyps: Inferences from Short-Read and Long-Read 16S rRNA Sequencing

被引:6
|
作者
Welham, Zoe [1 ]
Li, Jun [1 ]
Engel, Alexander F. [2 ,3 ]
Molloy, Mark P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Med Sci, Bowel Canc & Biomarker Lab, Sydney 2065, Australia
[2] Royal North Shore Hosp, Colorectal Surg Unit, Sydney 2065, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney 2050, Australia
关键词
bowel polyps; gut microbiome; 16S rRNA sequencing; PacBio long-read sequencing; FUSOBACTERIUM-NUCLEATUM; COLORECTAL-CANCER; FECAL MICROBIOTA; GUT MICROBIOME; POPULATIONS; BACTERIA; SHIFTS;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15205045
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Changes in the gut microbiome are associated with bowel cancers, however, less is known about the microbiome during the pre-cancerous bowel polyp stage. This study compared two DNA sequencing technologies to identify the gut microbiome from mucosa of colonoscopy patients diagnosed with bowel polyps or without bowel polyps. We found that different sequencing technologies and bioinformatic pipelines impact on bacterial taxonomy assignments. Overall, there were only minor differences in gut microbiome communities between participants with bowel polyps and those without. However, Ruminococcus gnavus, a bacteria commonly associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was shown to be more abundant in participants with polyps, despite participants with IBD being exclude from this study. This paper adds to our knowledge of the gut microbiome associated with bowel neoplasia.Abstract Numerous studies have correlated dysbiosis in stool microbiota with colorectal cancer (CRC); however, fewer studies have investigated the mucosal microbiome in pre-cancerous bowel polyps. The short-read sequencing of variable regions in the 16S rRNA gene has commonly been used to infer bacterial taxonomy, and this has led, in part, to inconsistent findings between studies. Here, we examined mucosal microbiota from patients who presented with one or more polyps, compared to patients with no polyps, at the time of colonoscopy. We evaluated the results obtained using both short-read and PacBio long-read 16S rRNA sequencing. Neither sequencing technology identified significant differences in microbial diversity measures between patients with or without bowel polyps. Differential abundance measures showed that amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) associated with Ruminococcus gnavus and Escherichia coli were elevated in mucosa from polyp patients, while ASVs associated with Parabacteroides merdae, Veillonella nakazawae, and Sutterella wadsworthensis were relatively decreased. Only R. gnavus was consistently identified using both sequencing technologies as being altered between patients with polyps compared to patients without polyps, suggesting differences in technologies and bioinformatics processing impact study findings. Several of the differentially abundant bacteria identified using either sequencing technology are associated with inflammatory bowel diseases despite these patients being excluded from the current study, which suggests that early bowel neoplasia may be associated with a local inflammatory niche.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A microbiome survey of contrasting potato terroirs using 16S rRNA long-read sequencing
    Boutsika, Anastasia
    Xanthopoulou, Aliki
    Tanou, Georgia
    Zacharatou, Maria -Evangelia
    Vernikos, Michalis
    Nianiou-Obeidat, Irini
    Ganopoulos, Ioannis
    Mellidou, Ifigeneia
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2024, 505 (1-2) : 431 - 448
  • [2] 16S rRNA long-read nanopore sequencing is feasible and reliable for endometrial microbiome analysis
    Oberle, Anna
    Urban, Lara
    Falch-Leis, Stefanie
    Ennemoser, Chiara
    Nagai, Yoko
    Ashikawa, Kyota
    Ulm, Patricia A.
    Hengstschlaeger, Markus
    Feichtinger, Michael
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2021, 42 (06) : 1097 - 1107
  • [3] Is Short-Read 16S rRNA Sequencing of Oral Microbiome Sampling a Suitable Diagnostic Tool for Head and Neck Cancer?
    Yeo, Kenny
    Wu, Fangmeinuo
    Li, Runhao
    Smith, Eric
    Wormald, Peter-John
    Valentine, Rowan
    Psaltis, Alkis James
    Vreugde, Sarah
    Fenix, Kevin
    PATHOGENS, 2024, 13 (10):
  • [4] Startups use short-read data to expand long-read sequencing market
    Eisenstein, Michael
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 (05) : 433 - 435
  • [5] Startups use short-read data to expand long-read sequencing market
    Michael Eisenstein
    Nature Biotechnology, 2015, 33 : 433 - 435
  • [6] PolyAtailor: measuring poly(A) tail length from short-read and long-read sequencing data
    Liu, Mengfei
    Hao, Linlin
    Yang, Sien
    Wu, Xiaohui
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 23 (04)
  • [7] Will long-read sequencing technologies replace short-read sequencing technologies in the next 10 years?
    Adewale, Boluwatife A.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [8] Microbiome of periodontitis and peri-implantitis before and after therapy: Long-read 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
    Yu, Pei-Shiuan
    Tu, Che-Chang
    Wara-aswapati, Nawarat
    Wang, Chen-Ying
    Tu, Yu-Kang
    Hou, Hsin-Han
    Ueno, Takaaki
    Chen, I-Hui
    Fu, Kuan-Lun
    Li, Huei-Ying
    Chen, Yi-Wen
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 59 (04) : 657 - 668
  • [9] Filling the gap of short-read next generation sequencing in PGD by long-read approach
    Ho, D. N. Y.
    Au, C. H.
    Lau, J.
    Wong, E. Y. L.
    Rocha, K. A.
    Xue, L.
    Shum, T. W.
    Law, Y. C.
    Ng, Y. Y.
    Lok, I. H.
    Tang, O. S.
    Lam, S. T. S.
    Chan, T. L.
    Ma, E. S. K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 419 - 420
  • [10] 16S rRNA Long-Read Sequencing of the Granulation Tissue from Nonsmokers and Smokers-Severe Chronic Periodontitis Patients
    Chowdhry, Rebecca
    Singh, Neetu
    Sahu, Dinesh Kumar
    Tripathi, Ratnesh Kumar
    Mishra, Archana
    Singh, Anjana
    Shyam, Hari
    Shankar, Pratap
    Lal, Nand
    Bhatt, Madan Lal Brahma
    Kant, Ravi
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018