The patient involvement in nursing education: A mixed-methods systematic review

被引:8
作者
Alberti, Sara [1 ]
Ferri, Paola [2 ]
Ghirotto, Luca [3 ]
Bonetti, Loris [4 ,5 ,10 ,11 ]
Rovesti, Sergio [2 ]
Vannini, Valeria [1 ,6 ]
Jackson, Mathieu [7 ]
Rossi, Francesca [8 ]
Caleffi, Dalia [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Biomed Metab & Neural Sci, Clin & Expt Med PhD Program, Modena, Italy
[2] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Biomed Metab & Neural Sci, Modena, Italy
[3] Azienda USL IRCCS, Qualitat Res Unit, Reggio Emilia, Italy
[4] Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale EOC, Nursing Res Competence Ctr, Dept Nursing, Bellinzona, Switzerland
[5] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Southern Switzerland, Dept Business Econ Hlth & Social Care, Manno, Switzerland
[6] Azienda USL Imola, Imola, Italy
[7] Univ Montreal, Hosp Res Ctr, Ctr Excellence Partnerships Patients & Publ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[8] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Interdept Ctr Educ Innovat, EduCare Lab, Modena, Italy
[9] Azienda Ospedaliero Univ Modena, Modena, Italy
[10] Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale EOC, Viale Officina 3, CH-6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
[11] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Southern Switzerland, Via Violino,11, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
关键词
Learning outcomes; Nursing education; Nursing evaluation research; Patient participation; Review; Teaching; SERVICE USER INVOLVEMENT; MENTAL-HEALTH; CARER INVOLVEMENT; CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; STUDENT NURSES; INTERGENERATIVITY; PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONALS; VULNERABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105875
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effects patient involvement in nursing education has on students, patients and academic staff using a specific theoretical framework. Design: Mixed-methods systematic review based on Joanna Briggs Institute methodology (Prospero no. Data sources: Seven databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, PsychINFO, Scopus, ERIC, Embase), Google Scholar and reference lists were searched. Review methods: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method studies published from 2012 to 2022 were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for eligibility and quality; any disagreement was discussed with a third reviewer. Data were extracted and analysed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute converged integrated approach. Results: Twenty-one qualitative, one quantitative and five mixed-methods studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were provided from three points of view: students, patients and academic staff. Student integrated findings included: (i) students' reactions towards patient involvement in education; (ii) students' views on the learning process and (iii) on ethical issue. From the patient point of view, the integrated findings addressed (i) patients' goals and effects on students' learning; (ii) how patients teach and get involved with students; (iii) how patients perceived their role; the patients' views on facilitators (iv) and barriers (v) in education; (vi) the perceived effects of being involved in education. Four integrated findings were derived from the academic staff's point of view: (i) academics' perceptions on patient vulnerability; (ii) perceived barriers to the efficacy of patient involvement in education; (iii) effects of patient involvement in nursing education; and (iv) methodological aspects of patient involvement in university curriculum. Conclusions: This systematic review provides useful information from all stakeholders' perspectives on the effects of patient involvement in nursing education. It offers a broader view of the implications for implementation and for developing theoretical frameworks and hypotheses for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), 2019, LEARN TOG ENG PAT PA
[2]  
Aromataris E., 2020, JBI manual for Evidence Synthesis, DOI [DOI 10.46658/JBIMES-20-01, 10.46658/jbimes-20-01]
[3]   Constructing a Search Strategy and Searching for Evidence [J].
Aromataris, Edoardo ;
Riitano, Dagmara .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2014, 114 (05) :49-56
[4]   A theoretical systematic review of patient involvement in health and social care education [J].
Bennett-Weston, Amber ;
Gay, Simon ;
Anderson, Elizabeth S. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2023, 28 (01) :279-304
[5]  
Burnier Isabelle, 2022, Can Med Educ J, V13, P69, DOI 10.36834/cmej.72429
[6]   How patient educators help students to learn: An exploratory study [J].
Cheng, Phoebe T. M. ;
Towle, Angela .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2017, 39 (03) :308-314
[7]   Learning the requirements for compassionate practice: Student vulnerability and courage [J].
Curtis, Katherine .
NURSING ETHICS, 2014, 21 (02) :210-223
[8]   Capturing Intergenerativity: The Use of Student Reflective Journals to Identify Learning Within an Undergraduate Course in Gerontological Nursing [J].
Davies, Susan M. ;
Reitmaier, Amy B. ;
Smith, Linda Reveling ;
Mangan-Danckwart, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2013, 52 (03) :139-149
[9]   Learning from patients about patient-centredness: A realist review: BEME Guide No. 60 [J].
de Groot, Esther ;
Schonrock-Adema, Johanna ;
Zwart, Dorien ;
Damoiseaux, Roger ;
Van den Bogerd, Kristin ;
Diemers, Agnes ;
Canet-Wittkampf, Christel Grau ;
Jaarsma, Debbie ;
Mol, Saskia ;
Bombeke, Katrien .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2020, 42 (04) :380-392
[10]   Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review [J].
Dijk, Stijntje Willemijn ;
Duijzer, Edwin Johan ;
Wienold, Matthias .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07)