Shared decision-making in physiotherapy: a cross-sectional study of patient involvement factors and issues in Japan

被引:3
|
作者
Ogawa, Tatsuya [1 ,2 ]
Fujimoto, Shuhei [3 ,4 ]
Omon, Kyohei [5 ,6 ]
Ishigaki, Tomoya [7 ,8 ]
Morioka, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Kio Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Neurorehabil, 4-2-2 Umaminaka,Koryo Cho, Nara 6350832, Japan
[2] Nishiyamato Rehabil Hosp, Dept Rehabil, 3-2-2 Sasayuridai,Kanmaki Cho, Nara 6390218, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Yoshida Honmachi,Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
[4] Shizuoka Grad Univ Publ Hlth, 4-27-2 Kitaando,Aoi Ku, Shizuoka, Shizuoka 4200881, Japan
[5] Kishiwada Rehabil Hosp, Rehabil Ctr, 2-8-10 Kanmatsu Cho, Kishiwada, Osaka 5960827, Japan
[6] Kyoto Univ, Dept Cognit Behav Sci, Grad Sch Human & Environm Studies, Yoshida Nihonmatsucho,Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
[7] Nagoya Gakuin Univ, Fac Rehabil, Dept Phys Therapy, 3-1-17 Taiho,Atsuta Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4560062, Japan
[8] Kawaguchi Neurosurg Rehabil Clin, Dept Rehabil, 9-25-202 Kourien Cho, Hirakata, Osaka 5730086, Japan
关键词
Shared decision making; Physiotherapy; Rehabilitation; Preference; Patient involvement; Patient participation; NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION; CONTROL PREFERENCES; INFORMATION NEEDS; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; ATTITUDES; ME;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-023-02208-1
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEvidence-based medicine education has not focused on how clinicians involve patients in decision-making. Although shared decision-making (SDM) has been investigated to address this issue, there are insufficient data on SDM in physiotherapy. This study aimed to clarify the issues concerning patient involvement in Japan, and to examine whether SDM is related to perceptions of patient involvement in decision-making.MethodsThe study participants were recruited from among acute and sub-acute inpatients and community residents receiving physiotherapy outpatient care, day care, and/or home rehabilitation. The Control Preference Scale (CPS) was used to measure the patients' involvement in decision-making. The nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) was used to measure SDM. In analysis I, we calculated the weighted kappa coefficient to examine the congruence in the CPS between the patients' actual and preferred roles. In analysis II, we conducted a logistic regression analysis using two models to examine the factors of patient involvement.ResultsAnalysis I included 277 patients. The patients' actual roles were as follows: most active (4.0%), active (10.8%), collaborative (24.6%), passive (35.0%), and most passive (25.6%). Their preferred roles were: most active (3.3%), active (18.4%), collaborative (39.4%), passive (24.5%), and most passive (14.4%). The congruence between actual and preferred roles by the kappa coefficient was 0.38. Analysis II included 218 patients. The factors for patient involvement were the clinical environment, the patient's preferred role, and the SDM-Q-9 score.ConclusionsThe patients in Japan indicated a low level of decision-making involvement in physiotherapy. The patients wanted more active involvement than that required in the actual decision-making methods. The physiotherapist's practice of SDM was revealed as one of the factors related to perceptions of patient involvement in decision-making. Our results demonstrated the importance of using SDM for patient involvement in physiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shared decision-making in physiotherapy: a cross-sectional study of patient involvement factors and issues in Japan
    Tatsuya Ogawa
    Shuhei Fujimoto
    Kyohei Omon
    Tomoya Ishigaki
    Shu Morioka
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23
  • [2] Patient experience and satisfaction with shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study among outpatients
    Tian, Cindy Yue
    Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi
    Qiu, Hong
    Zhao, Shi
    Wang, Kailu
    Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling
    Yeoh, Eng-Kiong
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 129
  • [3] Relationship between trust and patient involvement in medical decision-making: A cross-sectional study
    Pokhilenko, Irina
    van Esch, Thamar E. M.
    Brabers, Anne E. M.
    de Jong, Judith D.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [4] Patient involvement in decision-making: a cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic
    Ambigapathy, Ranjini
    Chia, Yook Chin
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (01):
  • [5] Physicians’ perspective on shared decision-making in Dubai: a cross-sectional study
    Mohamad Alameddine
    Reem AlGurg
    Farah Otaki
    Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali
    Human Resources for Health, 18
  • [6] Physicians' perspective on shared decision-making in Dubai: a cross-sectional study
    Alameddine, Mohamad
    AlGurg, Reem
    Otaki, Farah
    Alsheikh-Ali, Alawi A.
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [7] Shared decision-making in physical therapy: a cross-sectional observational study
    Hausheer, Andrea Claudia
    Suter, Larissa Carolina
    Kool, Jan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 23 (06) : 368 - 376
  • [8] Influencing factors of lung cancer patients' participation in shared decision-making: a cross-sectional study
    Wang, Ying
    Zhang, Jinna
    Hu, Bo
    Wang, Jizhe
    Zhang, Laixiang
    Li, Xiaohua
    Zhu, Xiuli
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 148 (12) : 3303 - 3312
  • [9] Influencing factors of lung cancer patients' participation in shared decision-making: a cross-sectional study
    Ying Wang
    Jinna Zhang
    Bo Hu
    Jizhe Wang
    Laixiang Zhang
    Xiaohua Li
    Xiuli Zhu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2022, 148 : 3303 - 3312
  • [10] Shared decision-making in maternity care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study
    Alruwaili, Tahani Ali
    Crawford, Kimberley
    Fooladi, Ensieh
    MIDWIFERY, 2024, 138