EU trade liberalisation, sectoral coalitions and development: insights from Moldova and Georgia

被引:2
作者
Langbein, Julia [1 ,5 ]
Cenusa, Denis [2 ,3 ]
Guruli, Irina [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr East European & Int Studies, Res Cluster Polit Econ & Integrat, Berlin, Germany
[2] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Chair Int Integrat, Dept Polit Sci, Giessen, Germany
[3] Expert Grup, European Integrat, Kishinev, Moldova
[4] Ilia State Univ, Econ Policy Res Ctr, Sch Business Technol & Educ, Tbilisi, Georgia
[5] Ctr East European & Int Studies, Res Cluster Polit Econ & Integrat, Mohrenstr 60, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Trade policy; European Union; development; trade liberalisation; Moldova; Georgia; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; POLICY; PERSPECTIVE; VARIETIES; INTERESTS;
D O I
10.1080/07036337.2023.2270773
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This paper contributes to the literature on EU trade policy by introducing insights from the political economy literature on development to the study of how EU trade liberalisation affects development in trading partners. Drawing on a comparison of EU trade liberalisation with Moldova and Georgia, we argue that the type of coalition between public and private actors in partner countries' top export sectors determines which firms benefit from better market access to the EU, as indicated by their ability to increase their exports. We show that liberalised trade with the EU tends to contribute to achieving the EU's declared objective of inclusive development if the presence of inclusionary development coalitions ensures that a broad range of firms is enabled to increase their export capacities through a mechanism that we call 'inclusive empowerment'. Otherwise, trade liberalisation contributes to exclusive development, benefitting big, mostly foreign firms, or, at worse, consolidating rent-seeking practices.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 234
页数:22
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D, 2012, NEW YORK REV BOOKS, V59, P85
[2]   Varieties of Limited Access Orders: The nexus between politics and economics in hybrid regimes [J].
Ademmer, Esther ;
Langbein, Julia ;
Boerzel, Tanja A. .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2020, 33 (01) :191-208
[3]   Trade, democracy, and the size of the public sector:: The political underpinnings of openness [J].
Adserà, A ;
Boix, C .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2002, 56 (02) :229-+
[4]  
Agora.md, 2019, DID CO FILIPS REL GE
[5]  
Agora.md, 2019, WALN EXP ORD RET 48
[6]  
Agrobiznes.md, 2018, REC REC FLOAR SOAR A
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, IMF Working Paper No. 96/98
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, OECD Investment Policy Reviews, DOI DOI 10.1787/0D33D7B7-EN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2016, FINANCIAL 0704
[10]  
Apostol O., 2016, WIPO MAGAZINE OCT