Understanding citizen perceptions of AI in the smart city

被引:11
作者
Lehtio, Anu [1 ]
Hartikainen, Maria [1 ]
Ala-Luopa, Saara [1 ]
Olsson, Thomas [1 ]
Vaananen, Kaisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Informat Technol & Commun Sci, Tampere, Finland
关键词
Human-centered AI; Citizen AI perceptions; Everyday AI; AI in the smart city; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-022-01589-7
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) is embedded in a wide variety of Smart City applications and infrastructures, often without the citizens being aware of the nature of their "intelligence". AI can affect citizens' lives concretely, and thus, there may be uncertainty, concerns, or even fears related to AI. To build acceptable futures of Smart Cities with AI-enabled functionalities, the Human-Centered AI (HCAI) approach offers a relevant framework for understanding citizen perceptions. However, only a few studies have focused on clarifying the citizen perceptions of AI in the context of smart city research. To address this gap, we conducted a two-phased study. In the pre-study, we explored citizen perceptions and experiences of AI with a short survey (N = 91). Second, scenario-based interviews (N = 7) were utilized to gain in-depth insights of citizen perceptions of AI in the Smart City context. Five central themes were recognized: (1) I don't like them monitoring me, (2) I want maximum gain for minimum effort, (3) I don't want AI to mimic people, (4) I'll avoid using AI if I consider the risk too high, and (5) I don't need to be concerned about AI. These offer an idea of human-centered requirements worth considering while designing AI applications for future Smart Cities.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1134
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] I Don't Know, Is AI Also Used in Airbags? An Empirical Study of Folk Concepts and People's Expectations of Current and Future Artificial Intelligence
    Alizadeh F.
    Stevens G.
    Esau M.
    [J]. i-com, 2021, 20 (01): : 3 - 17
  • [2] On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities
    Allam, Zaheer
    Dhunny, Zaynah A.
    [J]. CITIES, 2019, 89 : 80 - 91
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Interactions, DOI [DOI 10.1145/3001896, 10.1145/3001896]
  • [4] I, Chatbot: Modeling the determinants of users' satisfaction and continuance intention of AI-powered service agents
    Ashfaq, Muhammad
    Yun, Jiang
    Yu, Shubin
    Correia Loureiro, Sandra Maria
    [J]. TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2020, 54
  • [5] Bond RR, 2019, ROCHI, P2
  • [6] Braun V., 2006, Qualitative research in psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
  • [7] The post-panoptic society ? Reassessing Foucault in surveillance studies
    Caluya, Gilbert
    [J]. SOCIAL IDENTITIES, 2010, 16 (05) : 621 - 633
  • [8] Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of 'citizen-focused' smart cities in Europe
    Cardullo, Paolo
    Kitchin, Rob
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2019, 37 (05) : 813 - 830
  • [9] The smart city and its publics: insights from across six UK cities
    Cowley, Robert
    Joss, Simon
    Dayot, Youri
    [J]. URBAN RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2018, 11 (01) : 53 - 77
  • [10] Fagbola Temitayo M., 2019, 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS), P200, DOI 10.1109/ICIIBMS46890.2019.8991505