Life Cycle Assessment of Tomato Cultivated in an Innovative Soilless System

被引:1
作者
Pedala, Maria Concetta [1 ]
Traverso, Marzia [2 ]
Prestigiacomo, Simona [3 ]
Covais, Antonio [1 ]
Gugliuzza, Giovanni [4 ]
机构
[1] Circular SRL, Via Liberta 34, I-90141 Palermo, Italy
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Sustainabil Civil Engn, D-52062 Aachen, Germany
[3] Univ Palermo, Dept Agr Food & Forest Sci, Viale Sci,Build 4, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
[4] CREA Res Ctr Plant Protect & Certificat, C-o Dip SAAF Unipa,Viale Sci,Build 4, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
关键词
life cycle assessment; greenhouse; tomato; agriponic; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; GREENHOUSE; LCA; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/su152115669
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main goal of this study is to present the life cycle assessment results of an innovative closed-loop production system, called an agriponic system, used for producing tomatoes. In the study, this new system is presented, as well as its related environmental impacts generated for the production of the tomatoes. A life cycle assessment (according to ISO 14040) was applied to it, from seedling purchase and planting to harvest, using a functional unit of 1 ton of cherry tomatoes produced. SimaPro 9.3.0.3 software and the Ecoinvent database were used to analyze five impact categories. Plant growth emerged as the process unit with the highest impact, particularly for the ozone depletion potential (ODP), with a value of 0.00056 kgCFC-11eq, and for photochemical oxidation (POCP), with a value of 0.0784 kgC2H4eq impact categories. Greenhouse climate management presented a significant impact to the acidification potential (AP), with a value of 1.021 kgSO2eq. Conversely, the phases of plant transplanting, harvesting, and crop disposal had positive impacts for all impact categories considered in the study, because they were very low. In conclusion, agriponic greenhouse tomato production is a sustainable process. This is due to fewer pesticides that are used, and to nutrient solution reuse.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] AlShrouf A., 2017, Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. ASRJETS, V27, P247
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, Status of the World's Soil Resources
  • [3] Anton Assumpcio, 2005, International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology, V4, P102
  • [4] Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions
    Beach, Robert H.
    DeAngelo, Benjamin J.
    Rose, Steven
    Li, Changsheng
    Salas, William
    DelGrosso, Stephen J.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 38 (02) : 109 - 115
  • [5] Life cycle analysis of organic tomato production and supply in Sweden
    Bosona, Techane
    Gebresenbet, Girma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 196 : 635 - 643
  • [6] LCA of tomato greenhouse production using spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment indicators: an Albanian case study
    Canaj, Kledja
    Mehmeti, Andi
    Cantore, Vito
    Todorovic, Mladen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (07) : 6960 - 6970
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of protected crops: an Italian case study
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Longo, Sonia
    Mistretta, Marina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 28 : 56 - 62
  • [8] The energy balance and energy-saving measures in greenhouse tomato cultivation
    Elings, A
    Kempkes, FLK
    Kaarsemaker, RC
    Ruijs, MNA
    van de Braak, NJ
    Dueck, TA
    [J]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Greenhouse Systems, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, (691): : 67 - 74
  • [9] Faostat, 2021, FAO Stat
  • [10] Ghasemi F., 2022, J. Environ. Treat. Technol, V10, P35