Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review

被引：4

作者：

Dufour, Emilie ^{[1
]}

Bolduc, Jolianne ^{[2
]}

Leclerc-Loiselle, Jerome ^{[3
]}

Charette, Martin ^{[3
]}

Dufour, Isabelle ^{[4
]}

Roy, Denis ^{[5
]}

Poirier, Andree-Anne ^{[6
]}

Duhoux, Arnaud ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Montreal, Fac Nursing, Montreal, PQ, Canada

[2] Univ Montreal, Ecole Sante Publ, Montreal, PQ, Canada

[3] Univ Sherbrooke, Sch Nursing, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada

[4] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada

[5] Govt Quebec, Commissaire Sante & Bien Etre, Montreal, PQ, Canada

[6] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada

来源：

BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2023年 / 24卷 / 01期

基金：

加拿大健康研究院;

关键词：

Chronic care model; Systematic review; Community Care; Nurse-led care; Chronic disease; CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH-CARE; DIABETES-MELLITUS; CHRONIC ILLNESS; NURSES; INTERVENTIONS; QUALITY; CONTINUITY; ADULTS; COST;

D O I：

10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

BackgroundWhile there is clear evidence that nurses can play a significant role in responding to the needs of populations with chronic conditions, there is a lack of consistency between and within primary care settings in the implementation of nursing processes for chronic disease management. Previous reviews have focused either on a specific model of care, populations with a single health condition, or a specific type of nurses. Since primary care nurses are involved in a wide range of services, a comprehensive perspective of effective nursing processes across primary care settings and chronic health conditions could allow for a better understanding of how to support them in a broader way across the primary care continuum. This systematic overview aims to provide a picture of the nursing processes and their characteristics in chronic disease management as reported in empirical studies, using the Chronic Care Model (CCM) conceptual approach.MethodsWe conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews published between 2005 and 2021 based on the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers using the AMSTAR 2 tool.ResultsTwenty-six systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, covering 394 primary studies. The methodological quality of most reviews was moderate. Self-care support processes show the most consistent positive outcomes across different conditions and primary care settings. Case management and nurse-led care show inconsistent outcomes. Most reviews report on the clinical components of the Chronic Care Model, with little mention of the decision support and clinical information systems components.ConclusionsPlacing greater emphasis on decision support and clinical information systems could improve the implementation of nursing processes. While the need for an interdisciplinary approach to primary care is widely promoted, it is important that this approach not be viewed solely from a clinical perspective. The organization of care and resources need to be designed to support contributions from all providers to optimize the full range of services available to patients with chronic conditions.PROSPERO registrationCRD42021220004.

引用

页数：18

共 78 条

[51]

Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1136/bmj.n71]

[52] Practice nurse involvement in the management of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending a general practice: results from a systematic review [J].