An artificial intelligence algorithm for the classification of sphenoid sinus pneumatisation on sinus computed tomography scans

被引:2
作者
Taylor, Alon [1 ,6 ]
Habib, Al-Rahim [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Ashnil [3 ,4 ]
Wong, Eugene [1 ,5 ]
Hasan, Zubair [1 ]
Singh, Narinder [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Engn, Sch Biomed Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] ARC Training Ctr Innovat Bioengn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Westmead Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Westmead Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; endoscopic sinus surgery; paranasal sinuses; skull base; sphenoid sinus;
D O I
10.1111/coa.14088
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Classifying sphenoid pneumatisation is an important but often overlooked task in reporting sinus CT scans. Artificial intelligence (AI) and one of its key methods, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), can create algorithms that can learn from data without being programmed with explicit rules and have shown utility in radiological image classification.Objective: To determine if a trained CNN can accurately classify sphenoid sinus pneumatisation on CT sinus imaging.Methods: Sagittal slices through the natural ostium of the sphenoid sinus were extracted from retrospectively collected bone-window CT scans of the paranasal sinuses for consecutive patients over 6 years. Two blinded Otolaryngology residents reviewed each image and classified the sphenoid sinus pneumatisation as either conchal, presellar or sellar. An AI algorithm was developed using the Microsoft Azure Custom Vision deep learning platform to classify the pattern of pneumatisation.Results: Seven hundred eighty images from 400 patients were used to train the algorithm, which was then tested on a further 118 images from 62 patients. The algorithm achieved an accuracy of 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.1-97.0), 87.3% (95% CI 79.9-92.7) and 85.6% (95% CI 78.0-91.4) in correctly identifying conchal, presellar and sellar sphenoid pneumatisation, respectively. The overall weighted accuracy of the CNN was 85.9%.Conclusion: The CNN described demonstrated a moderately accurate classification of sphenoid pneumatisation subtypes on CT scans. The use of CNN-based assistive tools may enable surgeons to achieve safer operative planning through routine automated reporting allowing greater resources to be directed towards the identification of pathology.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 894
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on trans-sphenoid pituitary surgery [J].
Hamid, Ossama ;
El Fiky, Lobna ;
Hassan, Ossama ;
Kotb, Ali ;
El Fiky, Sahar .
SKULL BASE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2008, 18 (01) :9-15
[12]  
Hosmer DW Jr, 2013, WILEY SER PROBAB ST, P153
[13]   Artificial intelligence in radiology [J].
Hosny, Ahmed ;
Parmar, Chintan ;
Quackenbush, John ;
Schwartz, Lawrence H. ;
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2018, 18 (08) :500-510
[14]   An artificial intelligence algorithm that differentiates anterior ethmoidal artery location on sinus computed tomography scans [J].
Huang, J. ;
Habib, A-R ;
Mendis, D. ;
Chong, J. ;
Smith, M. ;
Duvnjak, M. ;
Chiu, C. ;
Singh, N. ;
Wong, E. .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2020, 134 (01) :52-55
[15]   How does the radiology community discuss the benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence for their work? A systematic discourse analysis [J].
Kim, Bomi ;
Koopmanschap, Isabel ;
Mehrizi, Mohammad H. Rezazade ;
Huysman, Marleen ;
Ranschaert, Erik .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 136
[16]   Volumetric study of sphenoid sinuses: anatomical analysis in helical computed tomography [J].
Magalhaes Oliveira, Juliana Mayara ;
Carrazzone Cal Alonso, Maria Beatriz ;
Albuquerque Pereira de Sousa e Tucunduva, Maria Jose ;
Fuziy, Acacio ;
Raphaelli Nahas Scocate, Ana Carla ;
Ferreira Costa, Andre Luiz .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2017, 39 (04) :367-374
[17]   Deep Learning in Radiology [J].
McBee, Morgan P. ;
Awan, Omer A. ;
Colucci, Andrew T. ;
Ghobadi, Comeron W. ;
Kadom, Nadja ;
Kansagra, Akash P. ;
Tridandapani, Srini ;
Auffermann, William F. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (11) :1472-1480
[18]  
Mehta KS., 2017, INT J OTORHINOLARYNG, V3, P833, DOI [10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20173669, DOI 10.18203/ISSN.2454-5929.IJOHNS20173669]
[19]   Automatic Segmentation of MR Brain Images With a Convolutional Neural Network [J].
Moeskops, Pim ;
Viergever, Max A. ;
Mendrik, Adrienne M. ;
de Vries, Linda S. ;
Benders, Manon J. N. L. ;
Isgum, Ivana .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 35 (05) :1252-1261
[20]   Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers [J].
Mongan, John ;
Moy, Linda ;
Kahn, Charles E., Jr. .
RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 2 (02)