Understanding technology acceptance in smart agriculture: A systematic review of empirical research in crop production

被引:29
作者
Thomas, Rosemary J. [1 ]
O'Hare, Gregory [2 ]
Coyle, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Comp Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Comp Sci & Informat, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Comp Sci, Dublin, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Technology acceptance; Systematic review; Smart agriculture; Crop farming; Prediction; Decision support; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; ADOPTION; DECISION; MODEL; ACCEPTABILITY; INVOLVEMENT; INTENTION; EASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122374
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Smart agriculture offers the potential to analyse agricultural data at a scale not previously possible. Researchers argue that the combination of rich data and intelligent decision support has the potential to improve productivity and profitability in agriculture, whilst also improving sustainability. We argue that achieving this potential re-quires not just on technological advancement, it also requires a detailed understanding of factors that impact technology acceptance in smart agriculture. Acceptance is necessary if technical advances are to translate into real-world impact. However, technology acceptance is complex and often poorly understood. This systematic review focuses on technology acceptance in prediction and decision support systems in crop production. Major databases were searched to identify papers that formally address technology acceptance and include detailed data. 16 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Common facilitators and barriers are identified, and papers are mapping against the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. This analysis showed that constructs including perceived effectiveness are addressed frequently, but others such as opportu-nity costs and burden have received less attention. The findings suggest the necessity for greater application of formal methods and the need for standardized, domain-specific methods to support this assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Alemu D., P 2015 IEEE INT C TE, P79
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions
[3]   From attitudes to behaviour: Basic and applied research on the theory of planned behaviour [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Christian, J .
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 22 (03) :187-195
[4]  
Arvila N., P 2 AFR C HUM COMP I
[5]   A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems [J].
Atkins, Lou ;
Francis, Jill ;
Islam, Rafat ;
O'Connor, Denise ;
Patey, Andrea ;
Ivers, Noah ;
Foy, Robbie ;
Duncan, Eilidh M. ;
Colquhoun, Heather ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ;
Lawton, Rebecca ;
Michie, Susan .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
[6]   IT as enabler of sustainable farming: An empirical analysis of farmers' adoption decision of precision agriculture technology [J].
Aubert, Benoit A. ;
Schroeder, Andreas ;
Grimaudo, Jonathan .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2012, 54 (01) :510-520
[7]   Precision farming uses typology in arable crop-oriented farms in northern France [J].
Ayerdi Gotor, Alicia ;
Marraccini, Elisa ;
Leclercq, Christine ;
Scheurer, Olivier .
PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2020, 21 (01) :131-146
[8]   Quo vadis, TAM? [J].
Benbasat, Izak ;
Barki, Henri .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 8 (04) :211-218
[9]   Exploring farmers' intentions to adopt mobile Short Message Service (SMS) for citizen science in agriculture [J].
Beza, Eskender ;
Reidsma, Pytrik ;
Poortvliet, P. Marijn ;
Misker Belay, Melisew ;
Sjors Bijen, Ben ;
Kooistra, Lammert .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2018, 151 :295-310
[10]  
Breault C., 2019, J Accessibil Design for All, V9, P90