Does a Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screen Predict the Risk for MRSA Skin and Soft Tissue Infection?

被引:5
作者
Hitchcock, Allison M. [1 ]
Seabury, Robert W. [1 ]
Kufel, Wesley D. [1 ,2 ]
Farooqi, Sara [1 ]
Steele, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Darko, William [1 ]
Miller, Christopher D. [1 ]
Feldman, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Upstate Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, 750 East Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Binghamton, NY USA
关键词
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA; nasal screen; skin and soft tissue infection; SSTI; purulent;
D O I
10.1177/10600280221127389
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are often caused by gram-positive bacteria that colonize the skin. Given the overuse of antibiotics, SSTIs are increasingly caused by resistant bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Guidance on the utility of MRSA nasal screening for MRSA SSTI is limited. Objective: To determine whether MRSA nasal screening predicts the risk of MRSA SSTIs. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with an SSTI diagnosis that had MRSA nasal screening and wound cultures obtained within 48 hours of starting antibiotics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated using VassarStats. Pretest and posttest probabilities were estimated with Microsoft Excel. Results: A total of 884 patient encounters were reviewed between December 1, 2018, and October 31, 2021, and 300 patient encounters were included. The prevalence of MRSA SSTI was 18.3%. The MRSA nasal colonization had a sensitivity of 63.6%, specificity of 93.9%, positive predictive value of 70.0% (95% CI = 55.2%-81.7%), negative predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI = 87.7%-94.9%), positive likelihood ratio of 10.39 (95% CI = 6.12-17.65), negative likelihood ratio of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.27-0.55), positive posttest probability of 70.0%, and negative posttest probability of 8.0%. Conclusions: Given the high positive likelihood ratio, a positive MRSA nasal screen was associated with a large increase in the probability of MRSA SSTI at our institution, and a negative MRSA nasal screen was associated with a small but potentially significant decrease in the probability of MRSA SSTI.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 676
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] MRSA nares swab is a more accurate predictor of MRSA wound infection compared with clinical risk factors in emergency department patients with skin and soft tissue infections
    Acquisto, Nicole M.
    Bodkin, Ryan P.
    Brown, Jack E.
    Graman, Paul S.
    Jones, Courtney Marie Cora
    Li, Timmy
    Hardy, Dwight J.
    Ashley, Elizabeth Dodds
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (06) : 357 - 360
  • [2] Clinical utility of negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal surveillance swabs in skin and skin structure infections
    Burgoon, Rachel
    Weeda, Erin
    Mediwala, Krutika N.
    Raux, Brian R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2022, 50 (08) : 941 - 946
  • [3] Correlation of MRSA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) wound swab testing and wound cultures in skin and soft tissue infections
    Clay, Tyler B.
    Orwig, Kara W.
    Stevens, Raice A.
    Davis, Emily P.
    Jennings, Timothy M., II
    Long, Timothy E.
    Riley, Brittany L.
    Hambuchen, Michael D.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 100 (04)
  • [4] Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Thresholds for Serious Bacterial Infections: A Scenario-based Survey Study
    Cressman, Alex M.
    MacFadden, Derek R.
    Verma, Amol A.
    Razak, Fahad
    Daneman, Nick
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 69 (06) : 930 - 937
  • [5] Diagnostic accuracy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization to predict methicillin-resistant S aureus soft tissue infections
    Gunderson, Craig G.
    Holleck, Jurgen L.
    Chang, John J.
    Merchant, Naseema
    Lin, Shin
    Gupta, Shaili
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (10) : 1176 - 1177
  • [6] Haran JP, 2019, EPIDEMIOL INFECT, V147, DOI [10.1017/S0950268818003291, 10.1017/s0950268818003291]
  • [7] Does universal active MRSA surveillance influence anti-MRSA antibiotic use? A retrospective analysis of the treatment of patients admitted with suspicion of infection at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers between 2005 and 2010
    Jones, Makoto
    Huttner, Benedikt
    Leecaster, Molly
    Huttner, Angela
    Damal, Kavitha
    Tanner, Windy
    Nielson, Christopher
    Rubin, Michael A.
    Goetz, Matthew Bidwell
    Madaras-Kelly, Karl
    Samore, Matthew H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 69 (12) : 3401 - 3408
  • [8] Current Epidemiology, Etiology, and Burden of Acute Skin Infections in the United States
    Kaye, Keith S.
    Petty, Lindsay A.
    Shorr, Andrew F.
    Zilberberg, Marya D.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 68 : S193 - S199
  • [9] Clinical and microbiological characteristics of purulent and non-purulent cellulitis in hospitalized Taiwanese adults in the era of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Lee, Chun-Yuan
    Tsai, Hung-Chin
    Kunin, Calvin M.
    Lee, Susan Shin-Jung
    Chen, Yao-Shen
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 15
  • [10] Economic outcomes of inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment for complicated skin and soft tissue infections: a multicenter prospective observational study
    Lipsky, B. A.
    Napolitano, L. M.
    Moran, G. J.
    Vo, L.
    Nicholson, S.
    Chen, S.
    Boulanger, L.
    Kim, M.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2014, 79 (02) : 266 - 272