The human-animal bond and at-home behaviours of adopted Indian free-ranging dogs

被引:4
作者
Mondal, Rubina [1 ]
Protopopova, Alexandra [2 ]
Bhadra, Anindita [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res Kolkata, Dept Biol, Dog lab, Nadia 741246, W Bengal, India
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Land & Food Syst, Anim Welf Program, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Free-ranging dog; Adoption; C-BARQ; Dog welfare; Human-animal bond; Global South; C-BARQ; DIRECTED AGGRESSION; DOMESTIC DOGS; OWNER; HEALTH; LIFE; SEX; ECOLOGY; WELFARE; TRAITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2023.106014
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Free-ranging dogs (FRDs) represent the largest population of dogs around the world. Their lives are not under direct human supervision and these dogs can be found in and around all possible forms of human habitation. Increased urbanization, poor population management measures and open garbage dumps have compounded their population over the years, leading to increased dog-human conflict, especially in the Global South. Pet keeping has been on the rise in India but most dogs are commercially acquired and are typically foreign breeds. Adoption of FRDs may be a potential solution for both population management and better welfare. While many studies have been conducted on dog behavior across the Global North, studies pertaining to adoptability, dog -human bonds, and welfare of FRDs have been largely missing. We investigated the in-house behaviour and human-animal bonds among adopted FRDs in India using a mixed method approach. Participants were recruited using social media using a snowball method. Data were collected on demographics and lifestyle of both the owners and their dogs, along with owner responses on the Canine Behaviour and Research Questionnaire (C-BARQ, Survey I) and the Monash Dog Owner Relationship Scale (MDORS, Survey II). Questions on reasons for adoption, not sterilizing their dogs and behaviour consultation were kept as open responses. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the C-BARQ items to investigate differences in factor structure from previously established studies in Europe and United States. Influence of demographic and lifestyle parameters on factor scores were investigated using logistic regression. We received valid responses from 1484 respondents for Survey I and 427 responses for Survey II from participants, who had filled the surveys for the same adopted FRD. A 13 -factor structure emerged from the EFA-Stranger directed aggression, Owner directed aggression, Dog directed aggression, Fear, Nonsocial fear, Touch sensitivity, Separation related problems, Attachment, Excitability, Energy, Chasing, Elimination and Stereotypy. Comparison of scores across sex and neuter status of the dogs revealed differences. Various demographic factors influenced the behaviour of the adopted dogs. Owners re-ported a very high Emotional Closeness, low Perceived costs and average dog-owner interaction. The dog-owner relationship was mostly influenced by lifestyle and demographic factors rather than the dog's behaviour. Overall, our results indicate that FRDs can adapt to a domestic life and make good pets. This study is a first attempt to bridge the ethnocultural gap on dog-keeping from India and lays the foundation for multiple avenues for future studies on the welfare of FRDs in the Global South.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Stereotypic animal behaviour: fundamentals and applications to welfare
[2]   The Impact of Pets on Everyday Life for Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Applebaum, Jennifer W. ;
Ellison, Carlyn ;
Struckmeyer, Linda ;
Zsembik, Barbara A. ;
McDonald, Shelby E. .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
[3]   Assessment of owner-directed aggressive behavioural tendencies of dogs in situations of possession and manipulation [J].
Balint, Anna ;
Rieger, Gabriella ;
Miklosi, Adam ;
Pongracz, Peter .
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2017, 4 (10)
[4]   Time-activity budget of urban-adapted free-ranging dogs [J].
Banerjee, Arunita ;
Bhadra, Anindita .
ACTA ETHOLOGICA, 2022, 25 (01) :33-42
[5]   Modelling the challenges of managing free-ranging dog populations [J].
Belsare, Aniruddha ;
Vanak, Abi Tamim .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[6]  
Berthoud D., 2011, J Vet Behav, V6, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.jveb.2010.09.014, DOI 10.1016/J.JVEB.2010.09.014]
[7]   The meat of the matter: a rule of thumb for scavenging dogs? [J].
Bhadra, Anandarup ;
Bhattacharjee, D. ;
Paul, M. ;
Singh, A. ;
Gade, P. R. ;
Shrestha, P. ;
Bhadra, Anindita .
ETHOLOGY ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2016, 28 (04) :427-440
[8]   Adjustment in the point-following behaviour of free-ranging dogs - roles of social petting and informative-deceptive nature of cues [J].
Bhattacharjee, Debottam ;
Bhadra, Anindita .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2022, 25 (03) :571-579
[9]   Free-Ranging Dogs Are Capable of Utilizing Complex Human Pointing Cues [J].
Bhattacharjee, Debottam ;
Mandal, Sarab ;
Shit, Piuli ;
Varghese, Mebin George ;
Vishnoi, Aayushi ;
Bhadra, Anindita .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 10
[10]   Pets in the Lives of Older Adults: A Life Course Perspective [J].
Bibbo, Jessica ;
Curl, Angela L. ;
Johnson, Rebecca A. .
ANTHROZOOS, 2019, 32 (04) :541-554