Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial

被引:3
作者
Yogamoorthy, Usha [1 ]
Saaid, Rahmah [1 ]
Gan, Farah [1 ]
Hong, Jesrine [1 ]
Hamdan, Mukhri [1 ]
Tan, Peng Chiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
balloon; cervical ripening; Foley; interval to birth; induction of labor; patient satisfaction; placement; previous cesarean; randomized trial; removal; vaginal birth after cesarean; COMPLICATIONS; FETAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101158
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Induction of labor in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unripe cervices is a high-risk process, carrying an increased risk of uterine rupture and the need for cesarean delivery. Balloon ripening is often chosen as prostaglandin use is associated with an appreciable risk of uterine rupture in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. A shorter duration of placement of the balloon typically expedites delivery; however, this has not been evaluated in induction of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in induction of labor after 1 previous cesar-ean delivery.STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from January 2022 to February 2023. Eligi-ble women with 1 previous cesarean delivery admitted for induction of labor were enrolled. Participants were randomized after balloon catheter insertion for 6 or 12 hours of passive ripening before balloon deflation and removal to check cervical status for amniotomy. The primary outcome was the induction of labor to delivery interval. The secondary outcomes were largely derived from the core outcome set for trials on induction of labor (Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health [CROWN]). The Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test were used as appropriate for the data.RESULTS: Overall, 126 women were randomized, 63 to each interven-tion. The mean induction of labor to delivery intervals were 23.0 (standard deviation, +/- 8.9) in the 6-hour arm and 26.6 (standard deviation, +/- 7.1) in the 12-hour arm (mean difference,-3.5 hours; 95% confidence inter -val,-6.4 to-0.7; P=.02). The median induction of labor (Foley ballooncatheter insertion) to Foley balloon catheter removal intervals were 6.0 hours (interquartile range, 6.0-6.3) in the 6-hour arm and 12.0 hours (interquartile range, 12.0-12.5) in the 12-hour arm (P<.001). The median induction of labor to amniotomy intervals were 14.1 hours (inter -quartile range, 9.3-21.8) in the 6-hour arm and 19.0 hours (interquartile range, 15.9-22.0) in the 12-hour arm (P=.02). The usage rates of epidu-ral analgesia in labor were 46.0% (29/63) in the 6-hour arm and 65.1% (41/63) in the 12-hour arm (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.98; P=.03). Spontaneous balloon catheter expulsion rates were 22.2% (14/63) in the 6-hour arm and 17.5% (11/63) in the 12-hour arm (relative risk, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.58; P=.50), and additional ripening use rates (Foley reinsertion) were 46.0% (29/63) in the 6-hour arm and 31.7% (20/63) in the 12-hour arm (relative risk, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-2.27; P=.10). The results were not differ-ent. Moreover, maternal satisfaction scores (0-10 numerical rating scale) of 9 (range, 8-10) in the 6-hour arm and 9 (range, 8-10) in the 12-hour arm (P=.41) were not different. Other secondary maternal and neo-natal outcomes were not significantly different either.CONCLUSION: Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 hours hastened birth and reduced epidural analgesia use in labor without a change in maternal satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, P393, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003079
  • [2] Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    Ye, Jiangfeng
    Moller, Ann-Beth
    Souza, Joao Paulo
    Zhang, Jun
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (06):
  • [3] Double-Balloon Device for 6 Compared With 12 Hours for Cervical Ripening A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bleicher, Inna
    Dikopoltsev, Elena
    Kadour-Ferro, Einav
    Sammour, Rami
    Gonen, Ron
    Sagi, Shlomi
    Eshel, Aya
    Nussam, Liraz
    Vitner, Dana
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (05) : 1153 - 1160
  • [4] Double-balloon catheter for induction of labor in 362 women with and without prior cesarean section
    Boisen, Anne B.
    Lokkegaard, Ellen C.
    Fuglsang, Jens
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2019, 4
  • [5] Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial
    Chia, Hang Min
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    Tan, Sze Ping
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Omar, Siti Zawiah
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study
    Cromi, Antonella
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Agosti, Massimo
    Serati, Maurizio
    Uccella, Stefano
    Arlant, Veronica
    Bolis, Pierfrancesco
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (04) : 338.e1 - 338.e7
  • [7] Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review
    Diederen, M.
    Gommers, J. S. M.
    Wilkinson, C.
    Turnbull, D.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (09) : 1086 - 1095
  • [8] Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study
    Dos Santos, F.
    Drymiotou, S.
    Martin, A. Antequera
    Mol, B. W.
    Gale, C.
    Devane, D.
    van't Hooft, J.
    Johnson, M. J.
    Hogg, M.
    Thangaratinam, S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (13) : 1673 - 1680
  • [9] Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: A systematic review
    Gommers, Jip S. M.
    Diederen, Milou
    Wilkinson, Chris
    Turnbull, Deborah
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 218 : 73 - 84
  • [10] Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gu, Ning
    Ru, Tong
    Wang, Zhiqun
    Dai, Yimin
    Zheng, Mingming
    Xu, Biyun
    Hu, Yali
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):