Thinking Beyond the Device: An Overview of Human- and Equity-Centered Approaches for Health Technology Design

被引:29
作者
Rodriguez, Natalia M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Burleson, Grace [4 ]
Linnes, Jacqueline C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sienko, Kathleen H. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Coll Engn, Weldon Sch Biomed Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Coll Hlth & Human Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Regenstrief Ctr Healthcare Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Design Sci, Coll Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Mech Engn, Coll Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
health technologies; human-centered design; equity-centered engineering; contextual investigation; community engagement; stakeholder engagement; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; DEFINITION; FRAMEWORK; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-bioeng-081922-024834
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A shift in the traditional technocentric view of medical device design to a human-centered one is needed to bridge existing translational gaps and improve health equity. To ensure the successful and equitable adoption of health technology innovations, engineers must think beyond the device and the direct end user and must seek a more holistic understanding of broader stakeholder needs and the intended context of use early in a design process. The objectives of this review article are (a) to provide rationale for the need to incorporate meaningful stakeholder analysis and contextual investigation in health technology development and biomedical engineering pedagogy, (b) to review existing frameworks and human- and equity-centered approaches to stakeholder engagement and contextual investigation for improved adoption of innovative technologies, and (c) to present case study examples of medical device design that apply these approaches to bridge the gaps between biomedical engineers and the contexts for which they are designing.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 280
页数:24
相关论文
共 123 条
  • [1] Visualization of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Data for Older Adults Using Participatory Design
    Ahmed, Ryan
    Toscos, Tammy
    Ghahari, Romisa Rohani
    Holden, Richard J.
    Martin, Elizabeth
    Wagner, Shauna
    Daley, Carly
    Coupe, Amanda
    Mirro, Michael
    [J]. APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 10 (04): : 707 - 718
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, Neglected Tropical Diseases. Fact Sheets Dengue and Severe Dengue
  • [3] A Crisis-Responsive Framework for Medical Device Development Applied to the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Antonini, Marc-Joseph
    Plana, Deborah
    Srinivasan, Shriya
    Atta, Lyla
    Achanta, Aditya
    Yang, Helen
    Cramer, Avilash K.
    Freake, Jacob
    Sinha, Michael S.
    Yu, Sherry H.
    LeBoeuf, Nicole R.
    Linville-Engler, Ben
    Sorger, Peter K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2021, 3
  • [4] Aranda-Jan CB, 2016, INT J DES, V10, P43
  • [5] Atman C., 2009, About: Designing., P399
  • [6] Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners
    Atman, Cynthia J.
    Adams, Robin S.
    Cardella, Monica E.
    Turns, Jennifer
    Mosborg, Susan
    Saleem, Jason
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (04) : 359 - 379
  • [7] The Three Rs: How Community-Based Participatory Research Strengthens the Rigor, Relevance, and Reach of Science
    Balazs, Carolina L.
    Morello-Frosch, Rachel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, 2013, 6 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [8] Community-Engaged Research Perspectives: Then and Now
    Barkin, Shari
    Schlundt, David
    Smith, Padget
    [J]. ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2013, 13 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [9] Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering
    Baxter, Gordon
    Sommerville, Ian
    [J]. INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2011, 23 (01) : 4 - 17
  • [10] Bell D, 2006, NAT REV MICROBIOL, pS34, DOI [10.1038/nrmico1524, 10.1038/nrmicro1524]