The Impact of day of Mailing on Web Survey Response Rate and Response Speed

被引:2
|
作者
Lynn, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Bianchi, Annamaria [3 ]
Gaia, Alessandra [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Survey Methodol, Colcheste, England
[2] Univ Essex, Inst Social & Econ Res, Wivenhoe Pk, Colcheste CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[3] Univ Bergamo, Econ Stat, Bergamo, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
关键词
adaptive design; survey invitation; survey nonresponse; targeted survey design; web surveys; MIXED-MODE DESIGN; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1177/08944393231173887
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The day of the week on which sample members are invited to participate in a web survey might influence propensity to respond, or to respond promptly (within two days from the invitation). This effect could differ between sample members with different characteristics. We explore such effects using a large-scale experiment implemented on the Understanding Society Innovation Panel, in which some people received an invitation on a Monday and some on a Friday. Specifically, we test whether any effect of the invitation day is moderated by economic activity status (which may result in a different organisation of time by day of the week), previous participation in the panel, or whether the invitation was sent only by post or by post and email simultaneously. Overall, we do not find any effect of day of invitation in survey participation or in prompt participation. However, sample members who provided an email address, and, thus, were contacted by email in addition to postal letter, are less likely to participate if invited on Friday (email reminders: Sunday and Tuesday) as opposed to Monday (email reminders: Wednesday and Friday). Given that no difference between the two protocols is found for prompt response, the effect seems to be due to the day of mailing of reminders. With respect to sample members' economic activity status, those not having a job and the retired are less likely to participate when invited on a Friday; this result holds also for prompt participation, but only for retired respondents. Also, sample members who work long hours are less likely to participate when invited on a Friday; however, no effect is found for prompt response.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 368
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review
    Sammut, Roberta
    Griscti, Odette
    Norman, Ian J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2021, 123
  • [42] A Note About the Definition of Response Propensity for Survey Nonresponse
    Little, Roderick J.
    JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2022, 10 (04) : 1098 - 1106
  • [43] Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework
    Holtom, Brooks
    Baruch, Yehuda
    Aguinis, Herman
    Ballinger, Gary A.
    HUMAN RELATIONS, 2022, 75 (08) : 1560 - 1584
  • [44] Using a Small Cash Incentive to Increase Survey Response
    Cosgrove, John A.
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 45 (05) : 813 - 819
  • [45] An analysis of non-response in a Swiss national survey
    Dey, Michelle
    Mohler-Kuo, Meichun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 58 (02) : 323 - 326
  • [46] Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment
    Guo, Yimeng
    Kopec, Jacek A.
    Cibere, Jolanda
    Li, Linda C.
    Goldsmith, Charles H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 106 (08) : 1422 - 1426
  • [47] Associations of Mail Survey Length and Layout With Response Rates
    Burkhart, Q.
    Orr, Nate
    Brown, Julie A.
    Hays, Ron D.
    Cleary, Paul D.
    Beckett, Megan K.
    Perry, Suzanne E.
    Gaillot, Sarah
    Elliott, Marc N.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2021, 78 (04) : 441 - 448
  • [48] Does the first impression count? Examining the effect of the welcome screen design on the response rate
    Haer, Roos
    Meidert, Nadine
    SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 2013, 39 (02) : 419 - 434
  • [49] Reducing the response imbalance: Is the accuracy of the survey estimates improved?
    Sarndal, Carl-Erik
    Lumiste, Kaur
    Traat, Imbi
    SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 2016, 42 (02) : 219 - 238
  • [50] Exploring Response Differences between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the Dutch European Values Survey 2008
    Bennink, Margot
    Moors, Guy
    Gelissen, John
    FIELD METHODS, 2013, 25 (04) : 319 - 338