Integration of consumer preferences into dynamic life cycle assessment for the sharing economy: methodology and case study for shared mobility

被引:5
作者
Fernando, Chalaka [1 ]
Buttriss, Gary [2 ]
Yoon, Hwan-Jin [3 ]
Soo, Vi Kie [1 ,4 ]
Compston, Paul [1 ]
Doolan, Matthew [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Australian Res Council, Training Ctr Lightweight Automot Struct, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] CSIRO, Australian E Hlth Res Ctr, Hlth Intelligence, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[4] Thinkstep Anz, Regus Off, Level 5, 616 Harris St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
[5] UNSW Canberra, Sch Engn & Informat Technol, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
关键词
Dynamic life cycle assessment; Consumer preference; Sharing economy; System dynamics; Consumer preferences; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; BUSINESS MODELS; SUSTAINABILITY; SERVICE; IMPACT; LCA; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-023-02148-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeThe rising of the sharing economy (SE) has lowered the barrier of purchase price to accessing many different products, thus changing the consumer decision paradigm. This paper addresses the challenge of assessing the life cycle impacts of SE systems in the context of this new consumer decision-making process. The paper proposes a methodological framework to integrate consumer preferences into the Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment (dynamic-LCA) of SE systems.MethodsIn the proposed consumer preference integrated dynamic-LCA (C-DLCA) methodological framework, system dynamics (SD) is used to combine consumer preference and the principal method, dynamic-LCA, which follows the ISO 14040 LCA framework. Choice-based conjoint analysis (CBCA) is chosen as the stated preference tool to measure consumer preference based on SE alternatives, attributes and attribute levels. CBCA integrates discrete choice experiments (DCE) and conjoint analysis features. Random utility theory is selected to interpret the CBCA results by employing multinomial logistics as the estimation procedure to derive the utilities. Derived utilities are connected in iterative modelling in the SD and LCA. Dynamic-LCA results are determined based on dynamic process inventory and DCE outcomes and then interpreted aligned with the SD policy scenarios.Results and discussionThe C-DLCA framework is applied to assess the GHG changes of the transition to car-based shared mobility in roundtrips to work in the USA. Carpooling and ridesourcing are selected as the shared mobility alternatives based on different occupancy behaviours. Powertrain system and body style are employed as the fleet technology attributes and the latter as an endogenous variable. Dynamic-LCA results are generated considering the high battery electrical vehicle (BEV) adoption as the policy scenario, and results are measured against a service-based functional unit, passenger-kilometre. The model outcomes show a significant reduction in aggregated personal mobility-related dynamic-GHG emissions by transitioning to car-based shared mobility. In contrast to the use phase GHG emissions, the production phase emissions show an increase. The results highlight the importance of integrating consumer preference and temporality in the SE environmental assessments.ConclusionsThe proposed C-DLCA framework is the first approach to combine consumer preferences, SD and LCA in a single formulation. The structured and practical integration of conjoint analysis, SD and LCA methods added some standardisation to the dynamic-LCAs of the SE systems, and the applicability is demonstrated. The C-DLCA framework is a fundamental structure to connect consumer preferences and temporal effects in LCAs that is expandable based on research scope.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 461
页数:33
相关论文
共 124 条
[91]   Defining Temporally Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment: A Review [J].
Sohn, Joshua ;
Kalbar, Pradip ;
Goldstein, Benjamin ;
Birkved, Morten .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 16 (03) :314-323
[92]  
Stasinopoulos P, 2013, SYSTEM DYNAMICS APPR
[93]   Use-stage life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of the transition to an autonomous vehicle fleet: A System Dynamics approach [J].
Stasinopoulos, Peter ;
Shiwakoti, Nirajan ;
Beining, Marvin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 278
[94]   A system dynamics approach in LCA to account for temporal effects-a consequential energy LCI of car body-in-whites [J].
Stasinopoulos, Peter ;
Compston, Paul ;
Newell, Barry ;
Jones, Haley M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (02) :199-207
[95]  
Sterman J., 2000, Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, DOI DOI 10.1108/13673270210417646
[96]   Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment: A Review of Research for Temporal Variations in Life Cycle Assessment Studies [J].
Su, Shu ;
Li, Xiaodong ;
Zhu, Chen ;
Lu, Yujie ;
Lee, Hyun Woo .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2021, 38 (11) :1013-1026
[97]  
Torres de Miranda Pinto J., 2019, Environ. Syst. Res, V8, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40068-019-0144-2, DOI 10.1186/S40068-019-0144-2]
[98]  
Train KE, 2009, DISCRETE CHOICE METHODS WITH SIMULATION, 2ND EDITION, P1
[99]  
U.S. Energy Information Administration-EIA, 2021, ANN ENERGY OUTLOOK 2
[100]  
U.S. Energy Information Administration-EIA, 2016, ANN ENERGY OUTLOOK 2